That does not mean you only look for the bad... ALL THE TIME. From the very start I said there were two ways Dooley could be "successful". One, turn out to be an up and comer that UT hired before his name got big. Two, restore order and rebuild the foundation so a top shelf coach could come in and win. The first hope is all but gone. I think winning out would get Dooley a reprieve. I have very little confidence the Vols will win this Saturday much less win out.
The one caveat to that is I could have a little more hope if they showed courage and had Worley start. He could play poorly and choke under pressure too... but at least it would be a different guy.
And that still would have been one of the most abjectly stupid things they could have done. If the roster had not been completely depleted then you could have done that. There's no way an interim finishes the '10 class like Dooley did. Attrition of non-EE's would have almost certainly have been high. A bad '10 class would have set the program back years more than it already was.
All you would have done is set whoever the eventual hire was up for failure. You and others would still be here calling for his head... and the roster would be nowhere near as good as it is.
No one was going to win those first two years. There simply wasn't enough talent, development, and experience on the roster. UT might have been a win or two better. With an interim, you can call it 3 years instead of two.
This was always the year. Dooley served a purpose that someone had to fill regardless of anything else. If he is replaced, the next guy walks into a situation tailor made for success- a deep, experienced OL, a D returning many players with talent and SEC experience, 2 or 3 talented QB's (DD inherited one- a Fr), talented skill players, no discipline issues, no big eligibility issues, no NCAA problems, and a recruit target list that has some of the best players in the country at least considering UT.