I really think Lunardi might be way off his usual pace this year. Some very confusing teams on his list, starting with Drexel. So much still to be decided this weekend.
Don't know if it's been mentioned, but the GA win took away one of our 100+ losses.
We now show 3. Most of the other bubble teams have 3 or more.
If they beat Vandy it sticks.
That definitely gives us a reason to root for UGA.
It's kind of a risk/reward proposition. We are definitely better off beating Vandy. But how would we stand if we don't have to beat a good team in order to get to the SEC finals? We already have a higher number of good wins compared to a lot of bubble teams. It's our bad-losses that are hurting us, getting UGA out of that category would help. (Even though at the time, it was a bad loss). At the same time, if Vandy loses back to back games, us and UGA, would it tarnish the quality of our win against them last week?
We're at 77 on most boards.Are we even sure that a 1-1 finish would put us 75+. We're at 76 right now. It wouldn't be that crazy to go 1-1 and finish at, say, 74, would it?
We're at 77 on most boards.
We're not going to jump much because the teams around us that we needed to lose have won.
With 1-1 we'll probably drop more than we rise.
Lunardi is always all over the place during championship week. Hell start moving bubble teams around inexplicably (moving teams that win, and have team lose in front of them, farther out of the dance, and vice versa). He usually comes to the correct configuration by Sunday, but he makes me scratch my head around this time every year.