overseasorange2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2006
- Messages
- 7,908
- Likes
- 5,645
This will be a good time to find out how much, if any, Milton has progressed since 2021. If he flops, it's probably going to be Jackson starting in '23. I've seen nothing thus far indicating that Milton will be the starting QB in '23, but that doesn't mean much. If he can't hack it at QB, he should move to TE. With his frame and athletic ability, it might be his best shot to make an NFL roster.I would love to see Milton throw for 400 yards and 6 TDs but I have a feeling all the weaknesses we saw last year will be exposed yet again. Everyone focuses on overthrows but that’s really just one of many issues he has. If he looks bad against Clemson it creates some concern going into next season unless they bring in a QB or Nico can be ready by game 1
The fact we ran so much vs Vandy had nothing to do with Milton it was 100% weather. But funny enough that actually makes the performance that much more impressive because they knew the run was coming and still got gashed 6x on the ground .Hard to say, considering not much is known about Clemson's backup QB, Klubinek. I take his performance against UNC with a grain of salt considering everything seemed to go Clemson's way that game and all he had to do was manage a wide lead. He did make some really nice plays that leave you concerned, but its alot different preparing and going into a game as the starter. The real pressure is on and many times these types of performances are followed up by humbling games.
At the same time, I don't expect our running game to perform anywhere near as well as it did in the Vandy game against Clemson. We broke off long run after long run and Milton really didn't have to do much of anything. And that is sort of concerning considering Vandy is one of 5 teams with a statistically worse passing defense as us. and Clemson has a really good rushing defense, 10th in the nation. Also, is Hyatt opting out? We have yet to find out.
So, there are a few unknowns and this game could play out either way. But I think bettors are more hopeful that Klubinek will perform better against our bottom 5 pass defense (since everyone does) than Milton will against their's. That may be especially true if Clemson's top 10 rushing defense stifles our running attack and our offense needs Milton to make big throws on 3rd and long. In that regard its not a great matchup for us. So I can understand why Clemson are near TD favorites against us at the moment. I think we lose this one something like 34-41.
I didn't think they could ever play worse, then came SC. I don't which game was worse, both were basic no-shows. How do you do that with so much on the line at SC?
This will be a good time to find out how much, if any, Milton has progressed since 2021. If he flops, it's probably going to be Jackson starting in '23. I've seen nothing thus far indicating that Milton will be the starting QB in '23, but that doesn't mean much. If he can't hack it at QB, he should move to TE. With his frame and athletic ability, it might be his best shot to make an NFL roster.
Hard to say, considering not much is known about Clemson's backup QB, Klubinek. I take his performance against UNC with a grain of salt considering everything seemed to go Clemson's way that game and all he had to do was manage a wide lead. He did make some really nice plays that leave you concerned, but its alot different preparing and going into a game as the starter. The real pressure is on and many times these types of performances are followed up by humbling games.
At the same time, I don't expect our running game to perform anywhere near as well as it did in the Vandy game against Clemson. We broke off long run after long run and Milton really didn't have to do much of anything. And that is sort of concerning considering Vandy is one of 5 teams with a statistically worse passing defense as us. and Clemson has a really good rushing defense, 10th in the nation. Also, is Hyatt opting out? We have yet to find out.
So, there are a few unknowns and this game could play out either way. But I think bettors are more hopeful that Klubinek will perform better against our bottom 5 pass defense (since everyone does) than Milton will against their's. That may be especially true if Clemson's top 10 rushing defense stifles our running attack and our offense needs Milton to make big throws on 3rd and long. In that regard its not a great matchup for us. So I can understand why Clemson are near TD favorites against us at the moment. I think we lose this one something like 34-41.
What's funny is that ball was about 5 yards under thrown. And rain is no excuse for that day. Football is played regularly in the rain/snow. It's not an excuse to be bad.
What's funny is that ball was about 5 yards under thrown. And rain is no excuse for that day. Football is played regularly in the rain/snow. It's not an excuse to be bad.
Some would possibly go as far to give Joe credit to do as well as he did given the conditions. You can’t truthfully deny that rain and wind don’t affect the game, excuses or not they are both a factor.
I hope you are right. But, so far, I see nothing that indicates Milton can make Heupel's offense run near as efficiently as Hooker. If Milton can't sustain drives, our D will be toast.But it sure is an excuse to hate on Joe, right? Why else do his detractors keep relentlessly posting negatives about him?
Me? Until proven otherwise, I think Javelin Joe is going to disintegrate the Clemson secondary. I'm a Vols fan who dares to believe when others can't or refuse to do so.
View attachment 525576
I hope you are right. But, so far, I see nothing that indicates Milton can make Heupel's offense run near as efficiently as Hooker. If Milton can't sustain drives, our D will be toast.
But it sure is an excuse to hate on Joe, right? Why else do his detractors keep relentlessly posting negatives about him?
Me? Until proven otherwise, I think Javelin Joe is going to disintegrate the Clemson secondary. I'm a Vols fan who dares to believe when others can't or refuse to do so.
View attachment 525576