Our coaches hit the road today evaluating prospects....

I hope you aren't depriving yourself of oxygen while you wait for those two things to happen. Hey, if our fan base wants to be stupid enough to believe that the football equivalent of making the student body president at Union County High the governor of Tennessee will work, more power to them. I just don't want to hear a word from anyone supporting Dooley now when we're down 35-3 at halftime in Gainesville in '11. If you are naive enough to buy this sham, you should have to keep your orange overalls on and suffer the consequences. I hold the Dooley supporters in the same contempt I do the buffoons who supported retaining Fulmer after the '05 season.

What ab the contempt you hold JP and Bruce supporters in.....wait....
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
As I've said before, Dooley may turn out to be all right, but if Bama or Florida had hired them, we would be celebrating.
 
Pretty sure the SEC isn't a step up in class from the NFL. Ask Nick Saban. Nice try. Alas, like Dooley did at la. Tech and will do at Tennessee, you fail.

Is that all you have as a response to that post. No parallells seen there in Dooley vs. Kiffy, huh. OK we will go there then. Ya know, Some may actually say that a SEC coaching Gig is a step up from Crazy Al's Raiders. Btw i called Nick , but he was out.........

But that wasn't the point at all, now was it?

I fail huh????...well are you a 100% sure of that???
 
Last edited:
Why do I keep getting the impression that this lady is truly behind hat's keyboard?

MissCleo.jpg


Ask La Tech fans if Dooley failed, hat. They were pretty pleased with what they were getting. And before you point out that they are used to losing thus winning by any margin would be a refreshing change, I will point out that this is my entire point about Dooley's tenure at La Tech.
If they think somebody failing to reach the lofty standards set by Gary Crowton isn't a failure, they are exactly the kind of idiots I have no problem disregarding. When Dooley sucks it up here, they can have him back in three years.
 
If they think somebody failing to reach the lofty standards set by Gary Crowton isn't a failure, they are exactly the kind of idiots I have no problem disregarding. When Dooley sucks it up here, they can have him back in three years.

Your definition of "idiot" is very broad and seems to encapsulate everyone who isn't you.
 
Your definition of "idiot" is very broad and seems to encapsulate everyone who isn't you.
If somebody wants to tell me 17-20 in the WAC, with your third year being worse than your second, isn't failure, I have no problem labeling that person an idiot.
 
I'm just saying if someone else made this hire, the overly optimistic portion of the fan base would see it for what it really is.

And they would all be eating their words if he won there. I'm not sure what bearing that has on reality. We didn't care about the opposing fans' opinion of our coach when Kiffin was here. Why should we start now?
 
There's a name for people who think that way: Imbeciles.
I wouldn't go that far. It may be a decision of preference. For example, Saban leaving Miami for Bama. Either he didn't have confidence in himself to win there, or he just preferred the college game.
 
So from him saying that...........

Never mind. It happens all the time here anyways. This thread will be about politics in about 5-10 pages.

To quote a oft used childish retort.
 

Attachments

  • 128877349782007810.jpg
    128877349782007810.jpg
    32 KB · Views: 41
If somebody wants to tell me 17-20 in the WAC, with your third year being worse than your second, isn't failure, I have no problem labeling that person an idiot.

Let's be honest, hat, you have no problem labeling any person an idiot.
 
I wouldn't go that far. It may be a decision of preference. For example, Saban leaving Miami for Bama. Either he didn't have confidence in himself to win there, or he just preferred the college game.
Saban left the Dolphins because he was a year away from not having a choice.
 
I wouldn't go that far. It may be a decision of preference. For example, Saban leaving Miami for Bama. Either he didn't have confidence in himself to win there, or he just preferred the college game.

Or they offered him a s***load of money.
 
And they would all be eating their words if he won there. I'm not sure what bearing that has on reality. We didn't care about the opposing fans' opinion of our coach when Kiffin was here. Why should we start now?
Let me rephrase it. People who seem to really like the hire are just optimists who won't look at how awful of a situation this is. This hire is, at best, almost a complete shot in the dark. It's sad to think Muschamp's ideas may have inspired us.
 
Let me rephrase it. People who seem to really like the hire are just optimists who won't look at how awful of a situation this is. This hire is, at best, almost a complete shot in the dark. It's sad to think Muschamp's ideas may have inspired us.

That depends on your perspective, I guess. This becomes a bad hire when Dooley cannot win games. It is brilliant if he starts beating the Bama and Georgia's of the world on a fairly consistent basis. I do not think at this point I would be willing to venture a guess either way.
 
That depends on your perspective, I guess. This becomes a bad hire when Dooley cannot win games. It is brilliant if he starts beating the Bama and Georgia's of the world on a fairly consistent basis. I do not think at this point I would be willing to venture a guess either way.
It's brilliant, but still lucky. His track record is mediocre at best. He didn't have a whole lot of time to do anything, but saying he would have is premature. He's completely unproven at this point. (And don't bring up Kiffin's resume in comparison. It's really not the same.)
 
Not true. I only label people who make moronic decisions as such.

Yes, but you would have no problem with it...

I only wish that you would allow some margin for error in your statements because there is no way possible for you to be as confident as you proclaim barring a mental condition that doesn't allow you to see possibilities outside of your own line of thinking.
 
There's a name for people who think that way: Imbeciles.


OH NO..the great hat reduce to childish comebacks because he obviously can't debate the issue at hand. Ok, you will have to help me, is this where i say,

I KNOW YOU ARE BUT WHAT AM I ?Or maybe i should go with the Im Rubber and Your Glue analogy???:question:

Again you didn't deal with the real issue did you?
 

VN Store



Back
Top