Hadden has all the physical tools to be a great CB. Really starting to wonder if we have the coach to get that out of our players though.Guess I'm in the minority because Hadden looks like a totally different player in the first two games imo. I cringed watching him play last season. Dude got burnt and still ran his mouth. He looks faster, more in control, and explosive. I wish he would look back but both of those balls were underthrown and I don't see any other DB not getting that first call
Could be. Could be a lot of different things. I just don't like the kneejerk reactions to things like this. Granted two not so great opponents but so far the secondary as a whole has held up very well. A couple of bad calls/bad plays by Hadden and we have people wanting Martinez fired... again.It’s interesting that Martinez didn’t get extended by Heupel. Some teachers are more effective than others. Possible it’s not the technique but the teacher?
Hadden is the #1 CB in the nation in Passes Defended and, outside of penalties, what I read earlier says he has given up only 16yds. . .
And that is against who exactly? Austin Peay and a Virginia team that barely has a pulse. Please. Get back to us after we play a team that throws better than Our Lady of Perpetual Help. This sounds like Memphis that is touting their defense after Bethune Cookman and Arkansas State.Hadden is the #1 CB in the nation in Passes Defended and, outside of penalties, what I read earlier says he has given up only 16yds. . .
So I noticed this during my son's HS practices. I asked my son because it seemed odd that no DB's turned their heads and only played the WR hands. He said that is how they are being told to play it. That they are being told to flat out play the WR hands and not try to get your head around to play the ball. This is for go routes anyway. Now I would assume at the college level this would change. Although I really don't know because it seems like almost every game I watched this weekend was very much the same.
This has been discussed many times and the general consensus seems to be that they are coached to focus on the receiver instead of the ball. Sometimes it works but when it doesn’t, in my opinion, it looks pretty bad. Case in point from Saturday with Hadden: On one play he got burned by the receiver but the ball was underthrown. Ended up being a PI call because he was turned facing the receiver and all over him trying to throw him off. If he had simply been playing the ball, that’s an INT. On his best play of the game imo, he turned around and jumped for the ball, great INT!