Paris Terror Attack Underway

I wanna pose a serious question...

Why is the EU and the US forcing these refugees on the European landscape and not on more available Muslim landscape like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and UAE?

Is this not suspicious, considering western leaders have made it their number one priority to fight ISIS and terrorism?
Same reason that they haven't opened up their lands to the "palestinians". They view these people as scum and want nothing to do with them. And as an added bonus, they know these morons buy into the jihadist agenda and will gladly blow themselves up for their baby raping prophet. The UAE,SA and Qatar are not our friends. They laugh at us behind our backs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Just the Obama administration? They were drawing up plans to go into Syria during his administration also. They are the ones that unleashed the TSA molesters on the American people.

Why just single out Obama?

Agree. This goes way beyond Obama.
 
Just the Obama administration? They were drawing up plans to go into Syria during his administration also. They are the ones that unleashed the TSA molesters on the American people.

Why just single out Obama?
Because he is currently sitting on the throne
 
The strategy is blatantly clear, the extremists knew that the attack would create an immediate and powerful backlash towards all refugees and muslim immigrants. They want that backlash to be felt by young, impressionable muslims. They want them to feel persecuted and racially/religiously discriminated against, so much so that they become radical. Creating that tension ensures recruits. They actually hope for the most severe responses possible because they believe, in the long run, it will just create more hatred for the west among the population.

There is no simple solution to this. It's kind of a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. And, before anyone says the simple solution is to nuke the middle east because it worked for Japan, that's not a comparable situation. Japan had a very structured, organized government and the country was a relatively small target. Radical islam is an ideal, not a structured government located on a small island nation. It's spread everywhere. You can't nuke an ideal, blowing everything up in one middle east country isn't going to stop radical islamic ideals everywhere else. Indiscriminate slaughter is only going to embolden their movement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
The strategy is blatantly clear, the extremists knew that the attack would create an immediate and powerful backlash towards all refugees and muslim immigrants. They want that backlash to be felt by young, impressionable muslims. They want them to feel persecuted and racially/religiously discriminated against, so much so that they become radical. Creating that tension ensures recruits. They actually hope for the most severe responses possible because they believe, in the long run, it will just create more hatred for the west among the population.

There is no simple solution to this. It's kind of a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. And, before anyone says the simple solution is to nuke the middle east because it worked for Japan, that's not a comparable situation. Japan had a very structured, organized government and the country was a relatively small target. Radical islam is an ideal, not a structured government located on a small island nation. It's spread everywhere. You can't nuke an ideal, blowing everything up in one middle east country isn't going to stop radical islamic ideals everywhere else. Indiscriminate slaughter is only going to embolden their movement.

A good start would be to kill their funding. Which would mean the Americas and Russia replace the Middle East in supplying the worlds oil. But still illegal for us to export crude.
 
They'd do it in a heartbeat if they had the means..

The question you need to ask yourself and the question that needs to keep you awake at night is "How would they get the means?" Who would willingly give a terrorist group nukes? The wrong kneejerk answer would be Russia based on some arrests they made a few months ago in Moldova, but deep down, we know that Russia has nothing to gain from giving these groups nukes because that would jeopardize them in the Caucauses and former Central Asian republics.
 
The question you need to ask yourself and the question that needs to keep you awake at night is "How would they get the means?" Who would willingly give a terrorist group nukes? The wrong kneejerk answer would be Russia based on some arrests they made a few months ago in Moldova, but deep down, we know that Russia has nothing to gain from giving these groups nukes because that would jeopardize them in the Caucauses and former Central Asian republics.


North Korea for starters, or better yet they just take them from say Pakistan, and thanks to Obama, Iran will be in the mix sooner than later .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
North Korea for starters, or better yet they just take them from say Pakistan.

First off, N. Korea can barely feeds its own people, much less engage in some nuclear arms deal, not to mention the fact that China wouldn't allow it because it would look like China used N. Korea as a proxy to strike Western targets.

And Pakistan isn't going to give up anything knowing India has nukes on its border and by default, Pakistan right now is the next strongest nuke power in the region next to Israel.

Name somebody else...
 
I take no gratification in dropping nuclear weapons on densely populated cities full of innocents, but hey, at your age, it probably takes some weird stuff to get you going. :whistling:

I'm glad you picked up on the sarcasm.
 
I'm glad you picked up on the sarcasm.

Oh, so you were joking this time?

It is really hard to distinguish between your jokes and when you are serious when human lives and liberties are up for discussion. Your sarcasm doesn't carry over to well in text form.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
First off, N. Korea can barely feeds its own people, much less engage in some nuclear arms deal, not to mention the fact that China wouldn't allow it because it would look like China used N. Korea as a proxy to strike Western targets.

And Pakistan isn't going to give up anything knowing India has nukes on its border and by default, Pakistan right now is the next strongest nuke power in the region next to Israel.

Name somebody else...

N Korea strapped for cash, corrupt Pakistani, they hid OBL for christs sake, and thanks to Obama, Iran will become a nuclear player sooner than expected.
 

VN Store



Back
Top