Majors
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2020
- Messages
- 17,675
- Likes
- 29,574
DePape is essentially admitting that the break-in was motivated by politics and his hatred of Democrats. I guess this thread will die now. Oh, well .. maybe next time, guys!
Sources who have heard the recording say that the tape shuts off just after DePape mentions spanking Pelosi with the rolled up shreds of Trump’s State of the Union.I hope we get to hear the attacker's story on:
1. If he thought the sex with Paul was worth the trouble,
2. Why gay people are violence-filled hammer attackers,
3. How his liberal views and support of Democrat initiatives made him the violent, gay man with a fetish for old men that he is today.
I hope we get to hear the attacker's story on:
1. If he thought the sex with Paul was worth the trouble,
2. Why gay people are violence-filled hammer attackers,
3. How his liberal views and support of Democrat initiatives made him the violent, gay man with a fetish for old men that he is today.
Oh yeah? Well what about that days-long thread where you and others said Chuck Schumer wasn’t to blame for Nicholas Roske and insinuated that he was just Kavanaugh’s jilted lover?I still can't believe that Elon Musk re-tweeted that story. If this is any indication of how things are going to run ... Twitter will be a cesspool in a few months.
So he asked the assailant to stop hitting him with a hammer so he could go take a leak? And the assailant complied??????I'm not buying this. There is no proof he was talking in code as there is no proof the intruder yelled "where is Nancy".
Politico reports info with no proof or valid, named sources:
"Where is Nancy?” the perpetrator called out before assaulting the speaker's husband with a hammer — an attack that rattled lawmakers."
Proof? Source?
"Paul Pelosi was able to dial 911 himself after telling the intruder he had to go use the bathroom and then calling from there, where his phone had been charging, according to a person familiar with the situation."
Again, where's the proof? Who is the "person" here? Was this "person" who was "familiar" with the situation in the house when this supposed "intrusion" occurred to know this? Was this "person" the one who opened the door for the police that the police later walked back claiming no third person was in the house?
So much garbage is being reported by the left-wing media they have no credibility, they have had no credibility for years.
Paul Pelosi attacker told investigators he planned to break House Speaker's 'kneecaps': affidavitEventually, you would think that the video tapes of the "anal(heh, sorry) intruder" entering the house should be released to show that it was a break-in in the middle of the night.
I mean if it is indeed what is claimed to be, should be able to clear this up shortly and move on to the next conspiracy theory, right? preferably one with two hot female capital hill interns and a tub of whipped cream.
If it lingers past a week or two, its only because they are being reluctant to provide info. Why that would be is a good question.
Read it.No. Absolutely not. Just stop. Get some help.
I have a hard time believing home security didn’t notice a breaking window and immediately dial 911. No way does the 3rd most powerful person in the country not have that kind of detection installed.Eventually, you would think that the video tapes of the "anal(heh, sorry) intruder" entering the house should be released to show that it was a break-in in the middle of the night.
I mean if it is indeed what is claimed to be, should be able to clear this up shortly and move on to the next conspiracy theory, right? preferably one with two hot female capital hill interns and a tub of whipped cream.
If it lingers past a week or two, its only because they are being reluctant to provide info. Why that would be is a good question.