Police shooting black man in the back ... again (Kenosha, WI)

[KB5252]

Illinois is one state. Wisconsin is another. Because they are more than one they are multiple states. Man, it's really hard being this smart.

You're so far behind you think you're first.

 

[n_huffhines]

Wisconsin Republicans take no action on policing bills

 

[evillawyer]

Yo white folks, let's get our chant going: "I say it's great, to be, melanin deprived. I say it's great, to be, melanin deprived."

 

[C-south]

Yo white folks, let's get our chant going: "I say it's great, to be, melanin deprived. I say it's great, to be, melanin deprived."

Lol. Who runs California?

 

[CagleMtnVol]

Wisconsin Republicans take no action on policing bills

Good

 

[C-south]

Wisconsin Republicans take no action on policing bills

They reference two pos criminals that the world is a better place without. Why should they change anything?

 

[508mikey]

Yo white folks, let's get our chant going: "I say it's great, to be, melanin deprived. I say it's great, to be, melanin deprived."

Cops arent going to do squat because more and more are finally aware some douche is filming them at all times

 

[RikidyBones]

Yo white folks, let's get our chant going: "I say it's great, to be, melanin deprived. I say it's great, to be, melanin deprived."

Isn't that the way you and the democrats want things?

 

[volbeast33]

Wisconsin Republicans take no action on policing bills

Here is a prime example why people can’t work together..... the republicans look to be acting like babies..... the democrats go extreme claiming the republicans are supporting white supremacists..... the media tells what’s in the bill which seems reasonable probably leaving out the nonsense that is probably included in the bill.

 

[KB5252]

Wisconsin Republicans take no action on policing bills

Is this a bad move you think? Would it not be better to study the problem from multiple angles first before going all knee jerk?

 

[InVOLuntary]

Yo white folks, let's get our chant going: "I say it's great, to be, melanin deprived. I say it's great, to be, melanin deprived."

Isn't this what you want? I was told refund/eliminate the police. I'm confused. So you want law enforcement? Or do you want law enforcement only for the pasties?

 

[ButchPlz]

Isn't this what you want? I was told refund/eliminate the police. I'm confused. So you want law enforcement? Or do you want law enforcement only for the pasties?

You know for a fact it's only the latter.

 

[Jravol78]

Check out the buttoned up top button. If Butch Jones had a son .....

 

[Jravol78]

Am I the only one who when I read The Villages, say it in my head like the jingle with elongated syllables?

Joe Biden back when he had a little more pep in his step

 

[NorthDallas40]

Check out the buttoned up top button. If Butch Jones had a son .....

Son? How dare you assume it’s gender.

 

[ajvol01]

Lies.

Lie #1: Kyle Rittenhouse didn't work at the auto dealership he was "protecting". Kyle was a lifeguard. He had NO relationship whatsoever with the auto dealer owner.

Lie #2: The auto dealer didn't give him his gun. Per Kyle's attorney, "The gun belonged to his friend, a Wisconsin resident."

Lie #3: Kyle wasn't there for "support" or "aid". He shot a man in cold blood, ran away, then shot 2 more men.

And, oh BTW, what business owner would ever ask a 17-year-old armed with AR-15 to "protect" his business?

This is redneck insanity.

Doesn’t look like cold blood from this view. Looks like he’s running away from Rosenbaum and then someone else shoots a round before Kyle fires his weapon

 

[NashVol11]

Kenosha’s finest

 

[evillawyer]

Donny is maybe the Dems best campaiger

 

[Y9 Vol]

Donny is maybe the Dems best campaiger

To bad for you that 40% of those present will vote FOR Trump. (per new polling)

 

[RockyTop85]

Here’s a bit more expanded picture for you to chew on. @RockyTop85 if you read the other link you might want to consider all the background in this link also.

Honestly it reads to me not that the jury wasn’t allowed to consider self defense but rather the circumstances under which an affirmative defense of self defense can be considered. That’s very different from a judge telling a jury that they may not even consider it.

And a better point is that the defendant was a convicted felon and thus his ability to even be able to shoot someone requires possession of a firearm and thus by definition is “engaged in unlawful activity” which precludes the ability to claim self defense

FindLaw's Supreme Court of Tennessee case and opinions.

It’s called jury nullification. Juries get instructions from the judge. If they choose not to follow those instructions to the defendant’s benefit, there’s nothing the government can do about it.

Really, if they choose not the follow the instructions to the defendant’s detriment there’s not much that can be done about it.

The whole system rests on an assumption that juries applied the law as instructed. So accuracy of the the instructions is what matters, which is what that case is about.

 

[C-south]

It’s called jury nullification. Juries get instructions from the judge. If they choose not to follow those instructions to the defendant’s benefit, there’s nothing the government can do about it.

Really, if they choose not the follow the instructions to the defendant’s detriment there’s not much that can be done about it.

The whole system rests on an assumption that juries applied the law as instructed. So accuracy of the the instructions is what matters, which is what that case is about.

A judge can also have biased instructions.

 

[evillawyer]

Yo white folks, let's get our chant going: "I say it's great, to be, melanin deprived. I say it's great, to be, melanin deprived."

And now, in the same city as the above clip, we get this:
Los Angeles Sheriff Deputies Shoot, Kill Black Man After Stopping Him for Alleged Bicycle Riding Code Violations

 

[NorthDallas40]

It’s called jury nullification. Juries get instructions from the judge. If they choose not to follow those instructions to the defendant’s benefit, there’s nothing the government can do about it.

Really, if they choose not the follow the instructions to the defendant’s detriment there’s not much that can be done about it.

The whole system rests on an assumption that juries applied the law as instructed. So accuracy of the the instructions is what matters, which is what that case is about.

Ok thank you. I made a couple of other posts later after the one you just replied to. In this case it appears that self defense was not available to the defendant as an affirmative defense due to the “in the process of committing an illegal act” which since he was a felon and shot somebody by definition he had committed an illegal act. Which the trial judge omitted that phrase which the Supreme Court acknowledges but deemed harmless?

And thank you for the reply.

 

[C-south]

And now, in the same city as the above clip, we get this:
Los Angeles Sheriff Deputies Shoot, Kill Black Man After Stopping Him for Alleged Bicycle Riding Code Violations

Was he breaking the law? Did he fight with the cops? I know idiots on here think law enforcement have to take a beating and match up weapon wise to the criminals their dealing with but the reality is they do not. Nobody does.

 

[NorthDallas40]

And now, in the same city as the above clip, we get this:
Los Angeles Sheriff Deputies Shoot, Kill Black Man After Stopping Him for Alleged Bicycle Riding Code Violations

If you’re trying to make the case that LA is another liberal **** hole town you can ease up on the effort we all agree with you girl.