Police shooting black man in the back ... again (Kenosha, WI)

We get it, both of you are just unloading emotional baggage.

Kind of like arguing with females.

I've never boarded a short bus to argue with its passengers but I imagine this is what it's like.

I wouldn't expect you to recognize sexism because along with the **** you just said, you have 100% gone on non-blue font record as saying women's suffrage was a mistake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RockyTop85
How are*

I'll do a small one, so as to plant the seed in your noggin to grow into what might just be a rational thought.

His push for Gonzalo Curiel to recuse himself from the Trump University lawsuit solely based on his Mexican heritage. That last bit is the very definition of reducing someone to little more than their racial identity.

Mexican is a nationality, not a race.

Try again.
 
Everything i have said is 100% factual and I never worked with any of those departments.

No, everything you said was a skewed account of actual events.

You're a cop apologist and a blue sheep. It's okay if you own it, but you let your emotional ties to your old profession cloud your objectivity.
 
Easy: he didn’t ask for a description by name, the name was supplied by the reporter paraphrasing the CAD summary or radio traffic.

Now you explain any scenario in which the reporter would note that Blake was mentioned by name at that point but uses the generic “someone” in connection with the 1099.
When you hear the 911 recordings word for word, come back and let me know what happened...you are usually pretty sensible but you want to "lawyer" something that is 100% clear as day... the dispatcher never said "someone" had a warrant, they stated it was Jacob Blake and the officer asked for his description by name. the only information that the dispatcher couldnt get that quickly was the vehicle description.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokey'sHandler
I've never boarded a short bus to argue with its passengers but I imagine this is what it's like.

I wouldn't expect you to recognize sexism because along with the **** you just said, you have 100% gone on non-blue font record as saying women's suffrage was a mistake.

It was and I have no shame in saying so.
 
No, everything you said was a skewed account of actual events.

You're a cop apologist and a blue sheep. It's okay if you own it, but you let your emotional ties to your old profession cloud your objectivity.
So please point out one thing that i said in that post that wasn't true...I'll be happy to see it
 
Show me a politician who isn't in it for their own gain. I'll wait.

Your troll game has gotten weaker, need to step it up a bit more

If I had a nickle for everytime I heard that... I must have been really something back in the day, because I'm still dragging nerds like you through the mud without any effort at all.
 
So please point out one thing that i said in that post that wasn't true...I'll be happy to see it

I don't feel like engaging in your constant goalposts movement like I was silly enough to do in the Ahmad Arbury thread and, subsequently, your "systematic" racism thread.

Sorry, Ricky.
 
True story: the only people that have ever lumped my Peruvian wife in with Mexicans and other Central Americans were liberals, as if the lower half of the western hemisphere is just one big homogenous blob.

In some discussions with some liberals here I have been told that Cubans are not Hispanic and black Cubans are AAs.
 
If I had a nickle for everytime I heard that... I must have been really something back in the day, because I'm still dragging nerds like you through the mud without any effort at all.

Son you couldn't drag anything. You really would be crying worse than you do on here.

Now be a man and show me a politician who isn't in it for themselves. I'm waiting
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10nacvols
I don't feel like engaging in your constant goalposts movement like I was silly enough to do in the Ahmad Arbury thread and, subsequently, your "systemstuc" racism thread.

Sorry, Ricky.
That's what i thought...100% factually correct..im not asking you to "move goalposts", I am asking you to point out one thing I stated in my "biased statements" that was wrong. You can't so you want to drop it
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10nacvols
True story: the only people that have ever lumped my Peruvian wife in with Mexicans and other Central Americans were liberals, as if the lower half of the western hemisphere is just one big homogenous blob.

I don't see how that mistake could be made by anyone who's met someone from each country. Physical features aside, the accents couldn't be more different.
 
In some discussions with some liberals here I have been told that Cubans are not Hispanic and black Cubans are AAs.
It's hilarious.

My wife, from Peru, has 100% European ancestry just like most of us, yet to liberals she's just another oppressed brown person that is the same as all the rest of the brown people.

I used to lean a little more moderate/left until I met and married her and watched how she was treated by leftists. Now most lefties would call me a nazi. Oh well.
 
That's what i thought...100% factually correct..im not asking you to "move goalposts", I am asking you to point out one thing I stated in my "biased statements" that was wrong. You can't so you want to drop it

No, sir. I gave you your time once before, and it was the longest circular narrative ai've seen on here. I'm not conceding to your factual nature because that doesn't exist. You used to be a cop so you are inherently biased. I'm just simply not going to engage with you on that basis along with the fact that, again, we've been here before.
 
Yeah, that's sexism.

So, **** right off?

And?

I've been told wanting same physical standards for men and women in the military is sexist, I've been told that opposing lowering standards so women can qualify for some jobs is sexist. So I guess I'm sexist. I'm right but sexist and can live with that.
 
In some discussions with some liberals here I have been told that Cubans are not Hispanic and black Cubans are AAs.

tenor.gif
 
And?

I've been told wanting same physical standards for men and women in the military is sexist, I've been told that opposing lowering standards so women can qualify for some jobs is sexist. So I guess I'm sexist. I'm right but sexist and can live with that.

I can respect that you own it, at least. I'm an ageist and I find humor in making fun of the disabled, which is a double whammy when it comes to you.

Nobody's perfect.
 

VN Store



Back
Top