Political Correctness = Democrat = Socialism = Taking down America

#180
#180
Fine, Exhibit A: Post #145 From Today at 3:47 PM

DAVOL said:
Let me break this down for you so your double digit IQ might (if we are lucky) understand . JOE A makes 1 milliion a year after taxes and gives 50% of his money to charity.Joe B makes 20k a year after taxes and also gives 50% to charity. They both have a $300 a month mortgage a $130 a month car payment they spend $150 a month on food and $40 a month on utilities.After all expenses Joe A still has $492,560 to live on while Joe B has $2560 for the rest of the year.Now do you understand what he was originally stating by saying he gives up a large percentage of his income considering he does not make much.Do you get it now if not well there may one day be a cure for mental retardation.:hi:
Click to expand...

Exhibit B: post #171 From Today at 4:51PM

TacomaJPP said:
Typically anyone that likes to call others dumb are insecure about their own intelligence. Furthermore, when you call people stupid etc, it shows your lack of intelligence and usually ends up making the entire discussion leave the realm of debating and turn into name calling and smack talking.

I can talk trash with the best of them, but when it comes to a political forum, there really is no place for it. It doesn't help us to understand the "other side" better or to gain perspective from another person's life experiences, which that boils down to complete arrogance and ignorance.
Click to expand...

I rest my case
 
#181
#181
emainvol said:
Fine, Exhibit A: Post #145 From Today at 3:47 PM



Exhibit B: post #171 From Today at 4:51PM



I rest my case
Click to expand...
I'm gonna give you another chance did this post below happen before or after I as you say became militant.Look real hard at the time stamp oh and by the way never become a lawyer.:)
Yesterday, 07:08 PM #139 (permalink) TacomaJPP
Home Sweet Home to me...



Join Date: Sep 2007
star.gif
Location: East TN
Posts: 504


Quote:
Originally Posted by DAVOL
2) "You give a large percentage to other despite your income level" doesn't make sense. Percentage is percentage regardless of what you make, but I forgot democrats don't believe in percentages (ie their idea of taxes)
Makes a whole hell of alot of sense on the contrary if I make 1million a year and give 50% I still have 500k to live on if I make 20k and give 50% I have 10k
to live on.Do you comprehend that? If so I'm glad I could help.If not there is not much I can do for double digit IQ's.:hi:

Thanks for the coherent post. :crazy:

Let me lay this out so that you can understand it...

In this instance, the amount given isn't what matters (or what remains after giving). It's about giving up a large portion of your disposable income. Of course, democrats never take into account that the "rich" reinvest their money a lot of times creating jobs, creating secondary jobs, and boosting local economies.
 
#182
#182
Jesus Christ dude, please explain to me how a post that quotes you calling someone out for having a "double-digit IQ" possibly qualifies as starting something? You really don't have a clue do you? You have to be a troll, there is no possible way that anyone is that dense.

Further, that is not even the post you quoted to begin with
 
Last edited:
#186
#186
Have fun gents, I have exams to study for, presentations to prepare, and papers to write.
 
#187
#187
emainvol said:
Jesus Christ dude, please explain to me how a post that quotes you calling someone out for having a "double-digit IQ" possibly qualifies as starting something? You really don't have a clue do you? You have to be a troll, there is no possible way that anyone is that dense.

Further, that is not even the post you quoted to begin with
Click to expand...
OK BRAINIAC NOW WHICH OF THESE WAS POSTED FIRST?
post_old.gif
Yesterday, 07:08 PM #139 (permalink) TacomaJPP
Home Sweet Home to me...



Join Date: Sep 2007
star.gif
Location: East TN
Posts: 504


Quote:
Originally Posted by DAVOL
2) "You give a large percentage to other despite your income level" doesn't make sense. Percentage is percentage regardless of what you make, but I forgot democrats don't believe in percentages (ie their idea of taxes)
Makes a whole hell of alot of sense on the contrary if I make 1million a year and give 50% I still have 500k to live on if I make 20k and give 50% I have 10k
to live on.Do you comprehend that? If so I'm glad I could help.If not there is not much I can do for double digit IQ's

Thanks for the coherent post. :crazy:

Let me lay this out so that you can understand it...

In this instance, the amount given isn't what matters (or what remains after giving). It's about giving up a large portion of your disposable income. Of course, democrats never take into account that the "rich" reinvest their money a lot of times creating jobs, creating secondary jobs, and boosting local economies.

OR THIS ONE
post_old.gif
Today, 04:47 PM #145 (permalink) DAVOL
THE HEBREW HAMMER



Join Date: Aug 2005
star.gif
star.gif
star.gif
Posts: 519


Quote:
Originally Posted by TacomaJPP
Thanks for the coherent post. :crazy:

Let me lay this out so that you can understand it...

In this instance, the amount given isn't what matters (or what remains after giving). It's about giving up a large portion of your disposable income. Of course, democrats never take into account that the "rich" reinvest their money a lot of times creating jobs, creating secondary jobs, and boosting local economies.

Let me break this down for you so your double digit IQ might (if we are lucky) understand . JOE A makes 1 milliion a year after taxes and gives 50% of his money to charity.Joe B makes 20k a year after taxes and also gives 50% to charity. They both have a $300 a month mortgage a $130 a month car payment they spend $150 a month on food and $40 a month on utilities.After all expenses Joe A still has $492,560 to live on while Joe B has $2560 for the rest of the year.Now do you understand what he was originally stating by saying he gives up a large percentage of his income considering he does not make much.Do you get it now if not well there may one day be a cure for mental retardation.
 
#189
#189
DAVOL said:
OK BRAINIAC NOW WHICH OF THESE WAS POSTED FIRST?
Click to expand...

this one.

DAVOL said:
2) "You give a large percentage to other despite your income level" doesn't make sense. Percentage is percentage regardless of what you make, but I forgot democrats don't believe in percentages (ie their idea of taxes)
Makes a whole hell of alot of sense on the contrary if I make 1million a year and give 50% I still have 500k to live on if I make 20k and give 50% I have 10k
to live on.Do you comprehend that? If so I'm glad I could help.If not there is not much I can do for double digit IQ's.:hi:
Click to expand...
 
#190
#190
GAVol said:
Use this button and it would be a heck of a lot easier to figure out.

multiquote_off.gif
Click to expand...
Actually I see now what emain was talking about I assumed he was talking about the post he put up here which happened today
post_old.gif
Today, 05:15 PM #180 (permalink) emainvol
Giver of Sexy



Join Date: Feb 2006
star.gif
star.gif
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 8,840


Fine, Exhibit A: Post #145 From Today at 3:47 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by DAVOL
Let me break this down for you so your double digit IQ might (if we are lucky) understand . JOE A makes 1 milliion a year after taxes and gives 50% of his money to charity.Joe B makes 20k a year after taxes and also gives 50% to charity. They both have a $300 a month mortgage a $130 a month car payment they spend $150 a month on food and $40 a month on utilities.After all expenses Joe A still has $492,560 to live on while Joe B has $2560 for the rest of the year.Now do you understand what he was originally stating by saying he gives up a large percentage of his income considering he does not make much.Do you get it now if not well there may one day be a cure for mental retardation.:hi:

Exhibit B: post #171 From Today at 4:51PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by TacomaJPP
Typically anyone that likes to call others dumb are insecure about their own intelligence. Furthermore, when you call people stupid etc, it shows your lack of intelligence and usually ends up making the entire discussion leave the realm of debating and turn into name calling and smack talking.

I can talk trash with the best of them, but when it comes to a political forum, there really is no place for it. It doesn't help us to understand the "other side" better or to gain perspective from another person's life experiences, which that boils down to complete arrogance and ignorance.

I rest my case
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by emainvol
what can I say, I enjoy a good spanking.



which actually happened after he patronized me last night at 7:08 but emain is right about me referencing double digit IQ IF HE DID NOT UNDERSTAND MY ORIGINAL POST WHICH MADE PERFECT SENSE IN CONTEXT TO 666's POST.
 
#195
#195
Anyone want to know how to keep DAVOL busy for hours??????



Say something, anything at all, and he's off like a rocket...

DAVOL, dude seriously, let it go, you are going to have an aneurysm.
 
#196
#196
Let's get back to debating the stupid financial meltdown and how Obama, Dodd, and Barney Frank are tied to it...
 
#197
#197
TacomaJPP said:
First, I'll find a link tying the democrats to the regulations. Give me a minute.

Second, do you need a link proving that democrats are socialists??? I thought this was universally accepted.[/QUOTE]


Yeah, by universal dumbazzes
Click to expand...
 
#198
#198
truefan said:
TacomaJPP said:
First, I'll find a link tying the democrats to the regulations. Give me a minute.

Second, do you need a link proving that democrats are socialists??? I thought this was universally accepted.[/QUOTE]


Yeah, by universal dumbazzes
Click to expand...

Honestly, I thought it was pretty universal. If I'm a dumbass what does it make you, when you can't use a "Quote/Reply" button?
Click to expand...
 
#199
#199
emainvol said:
This is the second time you have suggested that I don't understand something. You can kiss my ass on that one, I assure you I understand it fully. You simply cannot argue that neoconservative is not a term for a political philosophy and people who subscribe to said philosophy, regardless of how you feel about whether or not the term makes sense.

As for socialism, I feel that it is a good idea on paper. However, implementing it in its pure form into a heterogeneous society is not exactly practical.

But maybe I should dumb that down a bit so I can fit your view of me. It ain't gonna work here cause there is too many different type of folks
Click to expand...

"Neoconservatism" is as proper as "Putrefactiveliberalism" which is a modern form of socialistic thinking usually associated with the most leftwing college professors, and other government bureaucrats. For putrefactiveliberalism to be most effective its advocates have to have a their optic and rectal nerves entangled. This is how the accomplish their pronounced SHI%%Y OUTLOOK ON LIFE.

Most acknowledged putrefactiveliberals have never seen a tax they didn't like, an immigration law that should be enforced, an SAT test that wasn't racially prejudiced, a rapist who wasn't the product of breast feeding deprivation, a democrat who should honor their marriage vows or any governmental agency that has enough employees*.

I should have said "workers". Employee is a term relating to capitalism and Putrefactiveliberals would never use such a term. All socialist and communist refer to those in someone's employ as "workers" Employers and managers are not Workers in the vernacular of the Putrefactiveliberals.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top