My take on Burns is that, somewhere after the halfway point of the season it was clear he was dialed in, and at some point
he should not only have been moved back into the starting rotation but made the No. 1--he's that talented. And maybe he
felt the same way, I don't know.It's nice to have a stud coming out of the pen, but it's better to have a stud back in a starting
groove and then the coaches figure out the rest. He was, should have been, our Skenes--except that he wasn't. On the other hand,
we were playing a lot better in the second half of the season, and so maybe Vitello and the coaching staff wanted to stick with what
was working. That's understandable. But Burns is a starting pitcher--we saw that (in relief) in the Stanford game.