Post Election Day Voter Fraud

#27
#27
NurseGoodVol said:
All three cases you sighted included fraud, did they not?
Click to expand...

The act of the individual who sent in a ballot that wasn’t theirs or attempted to vote twice in some manner is fraud. They are also identified through the normal checks and balances of the election process and those second votes are disqualified.

Clerical errors such as sending out double ballots is not fraud.

On the topic of dead people, not one of the thousands of accusations has been verified to have a vote counted. On the other hand countless names have already been debunked.

Gandalf said:
As someone who enjoys data science https://everylegalvote.com/phd is a worthwhile read on being able to actually measure the amount of fraud that occurred.
Click to expand...

I can see the bias in that site in the URL. “Legal vote” has become the dog whistle du jour. Then I clicked on the links and it immediately went into debunked claims of count stoppage, mail in fraud, lack of onsite witnesses, ect. The first outbound link was to Gateway Pundit which is known for spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories.

It claima the evidence ia “beyond iron clad” yet the Trump legal fight hasn’t won a single case on any of these claims.

Keep looking though guys. The bombshell is probably around the same corner as as the pandemic. Hold on tight. We are rounding the turn.
 
#28
#28
Roustabout said:

Interesting
Click to expand...

maxresdefault.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol, VolinWayne, davethevol and 1 other person
#30
#30
burntorangeVOLffle said:
The act of the individual who sent in a ballot that wasn’t theirs or attempted to vote twice in some manner is fraud. They are also identified through the normal checks and balances of the election process and those second votes are disqualified.

Clerical errors such as sending out double ballots is not fraud.

On the topic of dead people, not one of the thousands of accusations has been verified to have a vote counted. On the other hand countless names have already been debunked.



I can see the bias in that site in the URL. “Legal vote” has become the dog whistle du jour. Then I clicked on the links and it immediately went into debunked claims of count stoppage, mail in fraud, lack of onsite witnesses, ect. The first outbound link was to Gateway Pundit which is known for spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories.

It claima the evidence ia “beyond iron clad” yet the Trump legal fight hasn’t won a single case on any of these claims.

Keep looking though guys. The bombshell is probably around the same corner as as the pandemic. Hold on tight. We are rounding the turn.
Click to expand...
The word debunked has also become a dogwhistle for " I haven't looked into any evidence of this beyond one article".
I looked at Wayne country election night and new it was going askew.
You do you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OL SMOKEY, Orangeslice13 and Orange_Crush
#32
#32
You know the guy I know. Big Democrat supporter and number/statistics guy. He says we’re in for a do-over with the system irregularities. I’m not smart enough to know **** from shinola but several people I trust are saying it’s not going to be over anytime soon.
Should be an interesting month.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM, davethevol and Orangeburst
#33
#33
NurseGoodVol said:
The word debunked has also become a dogwhistle for " I haven't looked into any evidence of this beyond one article".
I looked at Wayne country election night and new it was going askew.
You do you.
Click to expand...

No... debunked means the people in charge of the elections have come out and addressed the Twitter accusations.

If these “irregularities” are so iron clad, why do they keep getting thrown out of court?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#34
#34
Orangeslice13 said:
You know the guy I know. Big Democrat supporter and number/statistics guy. He says we’re in for a do-over with the system irregularities. I’m not smart enough to know **** from shinola but several people I trust are saying it’s not going to be over anytime soon.
Should be an interesting month.
Click to expand...

Lets do it then. I’m sure the Trump team is just holding out on the bombshell evidence for sweeps week. Trump looking to win the ratings for the big finale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#35
#35
burntorangeVOLffle said:
Lets do it then. I’m sure the Trump team is just holding out on the bombshell evidence for sweeps week. Trump looking to win the ratings for the big finale.
Click to expand...
It’s going to play out.
We will see who’s right.
I personally don’t have a clue anymore which way it’s going to go.
If the numbers guys are right then it’s a bad day for the republic.
 
#36
#36
luthervol said:
Pollster's were confounded by 2016.
Click to expand...
Baris wrote, “Trump won the largest non-white vote share for a Republican presidential candidate in 60 years. Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton in every major metro area around the country, save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM, davethevol, NurseGoodVol and 1 other person
#37
#37
Carl Pickens said:
Baris wrote, “Trump won the largest non-white vote share for a Republican presidential candidate in 60 years. Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton in every major metro area around the country, save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia.”
Click to expand...
I'm beginning to believe that they planned to cheat, were surprised by the landslide turnout for Trump, and had to stop counts long enough to cheat harder than they expected to--more than they could hide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM, BigO95, davethevol and 6 others
#38
#38
Orange_Crush said:
I'm beginning to believe that they planned to cheat, were surprised by the landslide turnout for Trump, and had to stop counts long enough to cheat harder than they expected to--more than they could hide.
Click to expand...
If the 6000 glitch isn’t caught I wonder how hard everyone would be looking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM
#39
#39
Orange_Crush said:
I'm beginning to believe that they planned to cheat, were surprised by the landslide turnout for Trump, and had to stop counts long enough to cheat harder than they expected to--more than they could hide.
Click to expand...

Basically yes. Hillary was surprised and that is why they didnt cheat the election away i 2016. I believe she is still angry she conceded since if she had not they could have tried to manufacture enough votes to win after the election. This time they were prepared and already had a bunch of votes in the system but the voter turnout for Trump was more than they counted on and they had to stop reporting the count in order to know how much ground to make up so that it would seem "unassailable" aka no recount.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaybird_1981, TN-POSSUM, RavinDave and 2 others
#40
#40
burntorangeVOLffle said:
No... debunked means the people in charge of the elections have come out and addressed the Twitter accusations.

If these “irregularities” are so iron clad, why do they keep getting thrown out of court?
Click to expand...
Have they addressed the irregularities with dominion in court yet?
I sincerely doubt every irregularity has been dealt with. In would trust a forensic analysis of the election programs by tech gurus than I would by election committee denials. After all, it's their own hind ends they are protecting.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM
#41
#41
NurseGoodVol said:
Have they addressed the irregularities with dominion in court yet?
I sincerely doubt every irregularity has been dealt with. In would trust a forensic analysis of the election programs by tech gurus than I would by election committee denials. After all, it's their own hind ends they are protecting.
Click to expand...
As far as I know the Trump team doesn’t have any cases regarding Dominion in court.... because they have no evidence to bring before a judge.

Most of the misinformation regarding Dominion is being spread by Q Anon accounts on SM. So if you believe Q then I guess you will believe anything.

From Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)....

“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double-checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result,”

“All of the states with close results in the 2020 presidential race have paper records of each vote, allowing the ability to go back and count each ballot if necessary.”

“There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.”


Rumor Control | CISA
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinMichigan
#42
#42
Gandalf said:
Basically yes. Hillary was surprised and that is why they didnt cheat the election away i 2016. I believe she is still angry she conceded since if she had not they could have tried to manufacture enough votes to win after the election. This time they were prepared and already had a bunch of votes in the system but the voter turnout for Trump was more than they counted on and they had to stop reporting the count in order to know how much ground to make up so that it would seem "unassailable" aka no recount.
Click to expand...

621D1437-C6A1-4D4B-B550-769633E7936A.gif
 
#44
#44
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM
#46
#46
NurseGoodVol said:
The word debunked has also become a dogwhistle for " I haven't looked into any evidence of this beyond one article".
I looked at Wayne country election night and new it was going askew.
You do you.
Click to expand...

If only we had a judicial branch to examine evidence that has any merit whatsoever
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top