Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

#3,026
#3,026
Sgt_Nick_Fury said:
Given the current batting averages of CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, Fox all the info that came out from twitter files.. Not sure which news organization has a moral high ground to say who is fake news. Maybe The Babylon Bee comes the closest to being honest still, they keep accurately predicting next weeks news today.
Click to expand...
So, that means you should trust The Gateway Pundit ???

It's obvious that you don't really care a damn thing about media bias. You wouldn't be posting links to The Gateway Pundit if you did. You are cool with media bias ... as long as it supports right-wing talking-points and extremist narratives.
 
#3,027
#3,027
BowlBrother85 said:
A person would have to be even dumber to believe anything that came from The Gateway Pundit ... which that crock of BS did. I'm sorry, but you guys are either hopelessly gullible or just incredibly stupid people.
Click to expand...
British probably made the same statement about Thomas Paine
 
#3,029
#3,029
BowlBrother85 said:
So, that means you should trust The Gateway Pundit ???.
Click to expand...

Implicitly. By far the best news source over all I have found. The closest to actual common sense, traditional values, and unafraid to expose the radical left. If you take issue with it, that tells me all about you I need to know. They of course get things wrong to sometimes, all media can and will if a source they use is incorrect, but I have yet to seem them purposely dishonest.

There two people in this world when it comes to opinions for me as of this moment. Those that genuinely like the Gateway Pundit, and communist heathen like yourself helping to destroy the fabric of our society.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangeBoro
#3,030
#3,030
Sgt_Nick_Fury said:
Implicitly. By far the best news source over all I have found. The closest to actual common sense, traditional values, and unafraid to expose the radical left. If you take issue with it, that tells me all about you I need to know.
Click to expand...
It certainly does say a lot about the caliber of your intellect, if you think The Gateway Pundit is a legitimate news source.
 
#3,032
#3,032
BowlBrother85 said:
It certainly does say a lot about the caliber of your intellect, if you think The Gateway Pundit is a legitimate news source.
Click to expand...
I Know right? It's okay my intellect is hard to live up to. Do not feel bad. Perhaps if you start reading history books you'll do better.
 
#3,033
#3,033
BowlBrother85 said:
Oh, I get it now .... You're a nut.
Click to expand...
Smoke another bowl brotha! Maybe that will help you as your constitutional rights are eroded, your economy destroyed, and the basic logistics of the nation you live in are attacked. If my understanding of what is going on makes me a nut, I'm gonna stick with my fellow nuts instead of the sheeple idiocracy.

Let's take this thread, if you honestly beleive the election is honest you are an idiot. If you think your vote being taken away regardless of who you prefer is a positive thing, you probably deserve the future that is coming. Yet another member of that ungrateful group who has known nothing but relative peace, and economic prosperity, because you were lucky enough to be born in a country with people who sacrificed for rights and freedoms you take for granted, and is inherently ungrateful for it, and going to have to learn the hard way.
 
Last edited:
#3,034
#3,034
Sgt_Nick_Fury said:
Smoke another bowl brotha! Maybe that will help you as your constitutional rights are eroded, your economy destroyed, and the basic logistics of the nation you live in are attacked. If my understanding of what is going on makes me a nut, I'm gonna stick with my fellow nuts instead of the sheeple idiocracy.

Let's take this thread, if you honestly beleive the election is honest you are an idiot. If you think your vote being taken away regardless of who you prefer is a positive thing, you probably deserve the future that is coming. Yet another member of that ungrateful group who has known nothing but relative peace, and economic prosperity, because you were lucky enough to be born in a country with people who sacrificed for rights and freedoms you take for granted, and is inherently ungrateful for it, and going to have to learn the hard way.
Click to expand...
None of this makes The Gateway Pundit a legitimate news source.
 
#3,036
#3,036
Your use of the word "indoctrinated" strongly implies that you understand that it's wrong to accept writings/teachings uncritically, but your embrace of a propaganda/fake news web site, such as The Gateway Pundit reveals that it's a one way street with you. You enjoy propaganda as a means of confirmation bias. It's only when propaganda conflicts with your belief system that you have a problem with it.

That is simple-minded.
 
#3,037
#3,037
BowlBrother85 said:
Your use of the word "indoctrinated" strongly implies that you understand that it's wrong to accept writings/teachings uncritically, but your embrace of a propaganda/fake news web site, such as The Gateway Pundit reveals that it's a one way street with you. You enjoy propaganda as a means of confirmation bias. It's only when propaganda conflicts with your belief system that you have a problem with it.

That is simple-minded.
Click to expand...


Rich irony..The MSM is trash and hypocritical.
 
#3,039
#3,039
BowlBrother85 said:
A person would have to be even dumber to believe anything that came from The Gateway Pundit ... which that crock of BS did. I'm sorry, but you guys are either hopelessly gullible or just incredibly stupid people.
Click to expand...

The Gateway Pundit does not produce original content. They simply publish the most outrageous stories intended to expose the leftist commie filth. Hence, your outrage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sgt_Nick_Fury and OrangeBoro
#3,040
#3,040
TNVOLNAVY said:
The Gateway Pundit does not produce original content. They simply publish the most outrageous stories intended to expose the leftist commie filth. Hence, your outrage.
Click to expand...
Yes, they do produce original content! You don't know what the hell you are talking about.

They simply publish lies and distortions without shame.
 
#3,041
#3,041
BowlBrother85 said:
Nothing in the "mainstream media" is comparable to The Gateway Pundit.

... and not all outlets which fit under the "main stream media" umbrella operate in the same manner. That is such overly broad terminology.
Click to expand...

**** dude....the wheat from the chaff. Who knows..But I sure as hell dont believe CNN, Wapo, NYT lies...

Our pols lie, our MSM..just what is the truth?

Just because one media outlet is Fact Checked by a politically or funded that supports an agenda.

We live in the incredible world of information and disinformation. And the light of truth is lost. Regardless of correct and incorrect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85 and InVOLuntary
#3,042
#3,042
Orangeburst said:
**** dude....the wheat from the chaff. Who knows..But I sure as hell dont believe CNN, Wapo, NYT lies...

Our pols lie, our MSM..just what is the truth?

Just because one media outlet is Fact Checked by a politically or funded that supports an agenda.

We live in the incredible world of information and disinformation. And the light of truth is lost. Regardless of correct and incorrect.
Click to expand...
MediaBiasFactCheck | Countering Disinformation

^^^^ This is from Countering Disinformation .org ^^^^

"Funding for Media Bias Fact-Check comes from donations and third-party advertising. We use third-party advertising to prevent influence and bias as we do not select the ads you see displayed. Ads are generated based on your search history, cookies, and the content of the current web page you are viewing. This sometimes leads to politically biased ads as well as the promotion of pseudoscience products that we do not endorse."

Media Bias Fact-Check is an independent online media outlet. They are as neutral as it will get among fact-checkers.
 
#3,043
#3,043
Anyone remember National Enquirer breaking the Governor Edward’s love child story? Since then any source can be considered.
 
#3,044
#3,044
BowlBrother85 said:
Yes, they do produce original content! You don't know what the hell you are talking about.

They simply publish lies and distortions without shame.
Click to expand...
Your last line unfortunately seems to apply 99% of all “news” sources today. Discerning “truth” today requires personal wisdom
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#3,045
#3,045
BowlBrother85 said:
MediaBiasFactCheck | Countering Disinformation

^^^^ This is from Countering Disinformation .org ^^^^

"Funding for Media Bias Fact-Check comes from donations and third-party advertising. We use third-party advertising to prevent influence and bias as we do not select the ads you see displayed. Ads are generated based on your search history, cookies, and the content of the current web page you are viewing. This sometimes leads to politically biased ads as well as the promotion of pseudoscience products that we do not endorse."

Media Bias Fact-Check is an independent online media outlet. They are as neutral as it will get among fact-checkers.
Click to expand...

You take a source for credibility as being all non biased?

There are truth nuggets out there on every platform. To say there is not political bias on every platform is naive. The fact checkers are political as well.

The muddle of truth and facts and who is one to believe?

Nuggets of truth by even the most eggregious to your opine..are real, regardless the massive media assault.

And why DC is a sewer. They get away with things because they control the narrative through media manipulation.

All I see out of DC is lies lies and lies. Should the WaPo create a list of lies for Biden?

Garbage.GIGO
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#3,046
#3,046
BowlBrother85 said:
MediaBiasFactCheck | Countering Disinformation

^^^^ This is from Countering Disinformation .org ^^^^

"Funding for Media Bias Fact-Check comes from donations and third-party advertising. We use third-party advertising to prevent influence and bias as we do not select the ads you see displayed. Ads are generated based on your search history, cookies, and the content of the current web page you are viewing. This sometimes leads to politically biased ads as well as the promotion of pseudoscience products that we do not endorse."

Media Bias Fact-Check is an independent online media outlet. They are as neutral as it will get among fact-checkers.
Click to expand...

Funding courtesy of Nazi George Soros

Report: George Soros Funds Global 'Fact Checking' Empire
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and Orangeburst
#3,048
#3,048
ClearwaterVol said:
I didn't see anything indicating Soros was funding this particular site.
Click to expand...
Media Bias Fact-Check is very transparent, and they are also just as critical of left-wing propaganda, such as Mother Jones and The Daily Kos (the George Soros site) as they are right-wing sites. I don't think most of these people even know who Soros is. They see his name used a lot and they are parrots who repeat what they hear. They don't actually know what it means. These people are idiots. I have never heard anyone argue that The Gateway Pundit is a legitimate news reporting agency before. You will find all the right wing lunacy here ...
 
#3,050
#3,050
Trump's 2020 presidential campaign hired a research firm to probe the results for election fraud but found no evidence, with the findings kept away from the public: WaPo

This is the Trump-iest story ever ....

****************************************
****************************************

A research firm hired by former President Donald Trump's 2020 campaign to validate the former president's claims of election fraud instead was unable to find evidence to support his theories, nor were the findings released to the public, according to the Washington Post.

The Berkeley Research Group was commissioned by the Trump campaign to analyze the voting data from six states to probe whether voter fraud or any irregularities had occurred during the 2020 election. Areas of focus for the probe were voter machine malfunctions, allegations that a mass of deceased individuals had voted in the election, and other evidence that could point to a Trump victory, per the report.

The Trump campaign envisioned using evidence from the report to bolster the then-president's claims in the public arena and in court.

But individuals with knowledge of the situation told The Post that the results didn't line up with what the Trump team had sought, and the research groups' findings were subsequently not disclosed to the public.

Roughly a dozen people at the Berkeley Research Group were part of a team analyzing the Trump campaign's claims, per the report, which included econometricians, who utilize mathematics and statistics to model outcomes.

The work was completed after the November 2020 election, during the remaining weeks of the year, and right before the January 6, 2021, riot at the United States Capitol.

Since his loss to President Joe Biden, Trump has continued to insist that he was the true victor in the contest, despite the lack of evidence of any widespread fraud.

Biden won the key swing states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin -- which were part of the Berkeley analysis -- but all were long deemed to be highly competitive during that presidential cycle.

"They looked at everything : change of addresses, illegal immigrants, ballot harvesting, people voting twice, machines being tampered with, ballots that were sent to vacant addresses that were returned and voted," said an individual familiar with the research who spoke with The Post.

"Literally anything that you could think of : Voter turnout anomalies, date of birth anomalies, whether dead people voted. If there was anything under the sun that could be thought of, they looked at it," the individual added.

According to four individuals who spoke with the newspaper, the findings were not what Trump officials were expecting from the analysis.

The researchers felt that there were some voting anomalies in several of the states and pointed to particular laws which may have been sidestepped, but they didn't feel as though it was enough to change the outcome of the election.

An individual with knowledge of the findings told The Post that the Trump team pushed for at least a dozen hypothesis to be tested.

"None of these were significant enough," the individual told the newspaper. "Just like any election, there are always errors, omissions and irregularities. It was nowhere close enough to what they wanted to prove, and it actually went in both directions."

A spokesperson for Berkeley Research Group told The Post : "Our experts provide independent and objective factual analysis and as a matter of firm policy, we do not comment on client engagements or on privileged and confidential matters."

After the November 2022 midterms, which saw many pro-Trump election deniers stumble at the ballot box, the former president proceeded to launch his 2024 campaign.

Trump is so far the only declared major Republican in the contest. But it won't be for long, as former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley is expected to join the GOP field on Wednesday at a campaign lunch in Charleston.

*****************************************
*****************************************

Basically, the 2020 Donald Trump Presidential Campaign paid The Berkeley Research Group to help them prove that they had been cheated out of the election. The Trump campaign received their findings prior to January 6, 2021 ... but since they didn't conclude that Trump had truly won the election ... the Trump campaign kept those objective findings (which they had paid for) a secret, while Trump pressed on with the rally at the Capitol on January 6th, and his lies that the 2020 Presidential Election had been rigged against him.

The January 6th "Stop the Steal" rally at the Capitol was based on a lie ... and Trump knew it.
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top