Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

#3,076
#3,076
wealthy Dems have been laundering money to Democrat party (Act Blue) through unsuspecting senior citizens....

 
#3,077
#3,077
I’ve always been amazed by the concept of “evidence for election fraud.” It seems to me that anyone who truly wanted to sway the outcome of election would know what was defined legally as election fraud and develop a plan that steered clear of those legal definitions. Hence, the would be no “evidence” and no judge would be able to rule those actions fraudulent.
 
#3,079
#3,079
newyorkvol said:
I’ve always been amazed by the concept of “evidence for election fraud.” It seems to me that anyone who truly wanted to sway the outcome of election would know what was defined legally as election fraud and develop a plan that steered clear of those legal definitions. Hence, the would be no “evidence” and no judge would be able to rule those actions fraudulent.
Click to expand...
This is what I mean…
There’s never going to be “evidence of election fraud” because elections are subject to other routes of influence.



And the Time article that pretty much admits such….
The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#3,081
#3,081
newyorkvol said:
I’ve always been amazed by the concept of “evidence for election fraud.” It seems to me that anyone who truly wanted to sway the outcome of election would know what was defined legally as election fraud and develop a plan that steered clear of those legal definitions. Hence, the would be no “evidence” and no judge would be able to rule those actions fraudulent.
Click to expand...

Exactly. The whole point of the type of election fraud I KNOW happens is that the only evidence is if the voter whose ballot they used somehow goes to the poll. But then nothing happens anyway. Also, it’s just easier to create fake voters and vote them. Senior centers have always been handy places to find votes.

I absolutely guarantee in any major city I could create 50k votes and there would be no evidence that you could find. Even if KNEW it was done and someone like me is was looking for evidence it’s not easy to find unless they get sloppy and run out of time because they didn’t prepare enough ballots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and davethevol
#3,086
#3,086
VolStrom said:
Would you like to place a bet that in every single state that mails unsolicited main-in ballots to every registered voter in their state, the democrat presidential candidate wins?
Click to expand...
The Republicans need to stop whining and actually prove their claims of massive fraud. I assure you it's not for lack of trying. Do you remember that commission Trump appointed right after he was elected to ferret out and prove voter fraud. It was headed by that idiot from Kansas Kris Kobach I believe his name is. Well they quietly folded after a few months because there was just nothing to find. Decades of claims and absolutely nothing to show for it. Put up or shut up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clarksvol00 and volfanhill
#3,087
#3,087
Hunerwadel said:
The Republicans need to stop whining and actually prove their claims of massive fraud. I assure you it's not for lack of trying. Do you remember that commission Trump appointed right after he was elected to ferret out and prove voter fraud. It was headed by that idiot from Kansas Kris Kobach I believe his name is. Well they quietly folded after a few months because there was just nothing to find. Decades of claims and absolutely nothing to show for it. Put up or shut up.
Click to expand...


You don't get it.

The whining about voter fraud had nothing to do with voter fraud. It's all about $
 
#3,089
#3,089
volfanhill said:
Yes. The same way the Dems fundraise off claiming R's want to shut down SS and hate minorities.
Click to expand...

Both absolutely true.

Your problem is Repubs have yet to prove a single case of systematic fraud. Nothing, zip, zero, despite the time and money spent on the search and the totally BS "news reports" that never seem to really have any proof.

It's been three freaking years and you got nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeMojo
#3,090
#3,090
WBO said:
Both absolutely true.

Your problem is Repubs have yet to prove a single case of systematic fraud. Nothing, zip, zero, despite the time and money spent on the search and the totally BS "news reports" that never seem to really have any proof.

It's been three freaking years and you got nothing.
Click to expand...
Voter fraud only has to be at the ballot? I’d say suppressing information by social media and MSM on a candidate/candidate family influenced the election. Not to mention a manufactured virus that placed a candidate in a basement.
 
#3,091
#3,091
WBO said:
Both absolutely true.

Your problem is Repubs have yet to prove a single case of systematic fraud. Nothing, zip, zero, despite the time and money spent on the search and the totally BS "news reports" that never seem to really have any proof.

It's been three freaking years and you got nothing.
Click to expand...
I think a big part of the problem is that no one that might have the power at the federal level to do something about it wants to touch it with a 10 foot pole. I believe the Supreme Court recently said as much when states sued Pennsylvania for election interference because they broke their own state law with the way some of the voting requirements were changed. The Supreme Court said that it would open Pandora’s Box if they took the case and ruled against Pennsylvania.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#3,092
#3,092
Majors said:
Voter fraud only has to be at the ballot? I’d say suppressing information by social media and MSM on a candidate/candidate family influenced the election. Not to mention a manufactured virus that placed a candidate in a basement.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry but that's way too much tin foil hat stuff for me to deal with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clarksvol00
#3,095
#3,095
clarksvol00 said:
"The media i don't like didn't say what I want, that means the election wasn't valid."
Click to expand...
Or the media that reported fabrication about one candidate as truth and chose to stay silent on another when evidence was presented. It’s not about like or don’t like, opinions by the media are not facts and shouldn’t be presented as truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and VolinWayne
#3,096
#3,096
Majors said:
Or the media that reporter fabrication about one candidate as truth and chose to stay silent on another when evidence was presented. It’s not about like or don’t like, opinions by the media are not facts and shouldn’t be presented as truth.
Click to expand...
I have absolutely no doubt that you think the media opinions that align with your political ideology are facts.
 
#3,097
#3,097
clarksvol00 said:
I have absolutely no doubt that you think the media opinions that align with your political ideology are facts.
Click to expand...
That’s a spin and my personal political ideology since I’ve voted for both parties is trust common sense. Regardless of who’s reading the selected narrative on the teleprompter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top