Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

I can find plenty of information, just like you said. I think the information is there and people will consume what they agree with. People's minds are made up whether they're paying attention to Mother Jones or Alex Jones.
I can find plenty of information. Does that mean 65-85 year old without access and relies nightly news does?
 
Still doesn't explain the extraordinary number of votes in Fulton. No other county approached 31% increase with MIB

Again, those votes were split in nearly same proportions in 2020 as they were in 2016. Trump actually outperformed in Fulton/Dekalb compared to the rest of the state. If Trump did not underperform in R led counties (compared to 16) in PA, NV, AZ, GA, MI, and WI, he's the POTUS right now....

Those factors plus Kamala/Warnock being on the ballot (as compared to HRC) in majority AA counties absolutely could explain increased turnout.
 
So you're saying the uninformed 65-85 year old demographic cost Trump the election?
Take it as you will if the information of demographics is there. Doesn’t take much to sway someone to not vote for a candidate. In this case the information withheld benefitted the left.
 
Again, those votes were split in nearly same proportions in 2020 as they were in 2016. Trump actually outperformed in Fulton/Dekalb compared to the rest of the state. If Trump did not underperform in R led counties (compared to 16) in PA, NV, AZ, GA, MI, and WI, he's the POTUS right now....

Those factors plus Kamala/Warnock being on the ballot (as compared to HRC) in majority AA counties absolutely could explain increased turnout.

And Fulton county had 31% more votes in 2020. That is BS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Are you saying MSM media has no influence on people?
Are you saying that people can't find media that suits their opinion?

And when you say MSM, I assume you are only talking about liberal media. Do you think conservative media has no influence on people?
 
Last edited:
You haven’t acknowledged MSM suppressing information to viewers on Biden prior to the election. You keep dancing that anyone can find information.
The only facts you've established are that you think the media distorted perception to affect the election; the real truth is out there and you found it readily accessible; you think the 65-85 demographic can't find the information; and you think the fact that the 65-85 demographic can't find that info stole the election.
 
Last edited:
Are you saying that people can't find media that suits their opinion?

And when you say MSM, I assume you are only talking about liberal media. Do you think conservative media has no influence on people?
That’s your problem CV. You make assumptions and run with them rather than discussing. I asked a question and you didn’t answer. I stated nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Majors
Again, those votes were split in nearly same proportions in 2020 as they were in 2016. Trump actually outperformed in Fulton/Dekalb compared to the rest of the state. If Trump did not underperform in R led counties (compared to 16) in PA, NV, AZ, GA, MI, and WI, he's the POTUS right now....

Those factors plus Kamala/Warnock being on the ballot (as compared to HRC) in majority AA counties absolutely could explain increased turnout.
Certainly interesting. So the same thing you’re highlighting in GA happened in the other swing states as well? Is that an assumption or have you looked up the counties and confirmed it? No need to post links. If you say you did it, I believe you. I’m just curious.
 
That’s your problem CV. You make assumptions and run with them rather than discussing. I asked a question and you didn’t answer. I stated nothing.
Didn't you assume I said the msm doesn't affect opinion? Is that your problem? The "msm" sways the opinion of its viewers just like conservative media sways the opinion of its viewers.
 
Last edited:
Didn't you assume I said the msm doesn't affect opinion? Is that your problem? The msm sways the opinion of its viewers just like conservative media sways the opinion of its viewers.
No, I asked. You did answer my question in your second sentence. I agree that both influence. Some people do watch whatever fits their beliefs while others watch whatever they believe to be impartial and could be influenced by that “impartial” media outlet. The problem is every source has some bias in it, to varying degrees of course. That’s why I always encourage people to go find the direct source if at all possible. Find the video, transcript or whatever and watch or read for yourself. Don’t rely on CNN, Fox News or whoever to do it for you as it will always come with some kind of narrative. These days you can almost always find the direct material. Almost.
 
No, I asked. You did answer my question in your second sentence. I agree that both influence. Some people do watch whatever fits their beliefs while others watch whatever they believe to be impartial and could be influenced by that “impartial” media outlet. The problem is every source has some bias in it, to varying degrees of course. That’s why I always encourage people to go find the direct source if at all possible. Find the video, transcript or whatever and watch or read for yourself. Don’t rely on CNN, Fox News or whoever to do it for you as it will always come with some kind of narrative. These days you can almost always find the direct material. Almost.

Do you think that there is a possibility Trump lost not because of media interference, but because he was so divisive?
 
The only facts you've established are that you think the media distorted perception to affect the election; the real truth is out there and you found it readily accessible; you think the 65-85 demographic can't find the information; and you think the fact that the 65-85 demographic can't find that info stole the election.
So the MSM and social media ran in full transparency the Biden laptop and candidates connection to the information. That’s the stance you’re taking? I gave a demographic as an example who doesn’t scour for news but takes the news presented.
 
So the MSM and social media ran in full transparency the Biden laptop and candidates connection to the information. That’s the stance you’re taking? I gave a demographic as an example who doesn’t scour for news but takes the news presented.
I never said that. How did Trump fare with the 65-85 demographic?
 
Do you think that there is a possibility Trump lost not because of media interference, but because he was so divisive?
Sure. That’s certainly possible. I do think media influence is also possible. I’m sure you read the same Time article I did that reviewed the coordination of multiple media outlets and others to take Trump down. Was that coordinated effort alone responsible? Likely not. I’m guessing it was a combo of things from media influence, Trump never shutting his mouth, changes in election rules where Dems outmaneuvered Reps, COVID response and who knows what else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gandalf
This is funny. I’m sure someone posted this somewhere else.

Prior to 2020 election: I won’t go find the links but plenty of articles say Dominion voting machines have vulnerabilities.

Right after 2020 election: Dominion voting machines became impenetrable.

Now: Back to Dominion voting machines having vulnerabilities.

Critics blast Georgia's plan to delay software updates on its voting machines

Before you go nuts Clark, no I don’t think Dominion had anything to do with Trump losing. I just find the flipping and flopping entertaining.
 
Both absolutely true.

Your problem is Repubs have yet to prove a single case of systematic fraud. Nothing, zip, zero, despite the time and money spent on the search and the totally BS "news reports" that never seem to really have any proof.

It's been three freaking years and you got nothing.
“You”?
You do realize it’s not just Dem versus Rep. Do you really think the Dems don’t do it to Dems and the Rep don’t do it to Rep?
Voter fraud is stealing the voice of the American public.
 

VN Store



Back
Top