Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

#3,327
#3,327
BernardKingGOAT said:
How many times before 2020 did you shout fraud?
Click to expand...

It's only rigged against Trump.

He never loses. Ever.

The professional victim was planting his seeds of "fraud" to the weak minded imbeciles that hugged his b-list nuttz long before the first ballot was cast.

These morons are going to be in for another shock when he gets beat again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN Ribs
#3,330
#3,330
BreatheUT said:
Thats rite....perfectly clean election I tell you. The same election where 50+ "intelligence" agents said Hunter's laptop was disinformation.

Please tell me you aren't that naive. Damn man.

Tnribs response - "Prove it". "Prove it".
Click to expand...

Trump lost, get over it. I've never seen a former President or his supporters whine so much and play the victim for going-on three years now. Trump and his supporters that cling to debunked conspiracy theories are weak and feckless. Blind allegiance to a criminal and his lies is sad and pathetic.
 
#3,331
#3,331
TN Ribs said:
Trump lost, get over it. I've never seen a former President or his supporters whine so much and play the victim for going-on three years now. Trump and his supporters that cling to debunked conspiracy theories are weak and feckless. Blind allegiance to a criminal and his lies is sad and pathetic.
Click to expand...

You're missing the bigger picture. To want fair elections has nothing to do with Trump. It should be at the core of any modern society.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, VolinWayne, AM64 and 1 other person
#3,332
#3,332
BreatheUT said:
You're missing the bigger picture. To want fair elections has nothing to do with Trump. It should be at the core of any modern society.
Click to expand...
Essential
This drop box stuff with signature verification, which is unreliable and non scientific, only fuels conspiracy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, AM64, W.TN.Orange Blood and 2 others
#3,333
#3,333
Orangeburst said:
Essential
This drop box stuff with signature verification, which is unreliable and non scientific, only fuels conspiracy.
Click to expand...

Just like a corporation does not or should not intentionally create processes to create ambiguity in its processes, a government should not create rules that further the lack of public trust and difficult audit unless you're attempting to hide something.

Why do the Biden's have 20 shell companies that offer nothing, and numerous foreign bank accounts?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne, davethevol, AM64 and 2 others
#3,334
#3,334
BreatheUT said:
Just like a corporation does notor should not intentionally create processes to create ambiguity, a government should not create rules that further the lack of public trust and difficult audit unless you're attempting to hide something.

Why do the Biden's have 20 shell companies that offer nothing, and numerous foreign bank accounts.
Click to expand...
Same thing with bills..too bloated, complex and even the legislature doesn’t or can’t read them. Same with taxes..
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne, AM64, whodeycin85 and 1 other person
#3,336
#3,336
BreatheUT said:
You're missing the bigger picture. To want fair elections has nothing to do with Trump. It should be at the core of any modern society.
Click to expand...

It was a fair election, this has everything to do with Trump who has been lying about the election for three years and the dingbats on this site who buy into his nonsense. You have an impressionable mind, if there was a picture in the dictionary of the term "Confirmation Bias", there would be a picture of you.
No further proof is needed than your unwavering support of Tucker Carlson even though it was proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that he was lying to you on a nightly basis. You are a puppet - nothing more, nothing less.
 
#3,337
#3,337
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Ribs is a blowhard dedicated Biden boot-licker.
When Biden tells him to jump he asks how high my Fuhrer.
Joe Biden is to the Democrats what Hitler was to Germany ... Führer - Wikipedia.
Click to expand...

When W. TN (probably the most illiterate poster on the forum) tries to criticize me, I know for certain I am on the right side of the argument. W TN. is like Trump, whatever they say, you know the opposite is true. If more people followed this simple rule, the world would be a better place.
 
#3,338
#3,338
Just a reminder. Trump didn't lose in 2020 because of his underperformance in blue areas. He lost because of his underperformance in Republican led suburban areas.

If there was widespread fraud, Trump would have performed similarly to other Rs for county or state wide seats. He didn't- He performed in the bottom 20% of Rs in swing states. That's why he lost...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
#3,346
#3,346
rekinhavoc said:
Click to expand...


"Former Juab County Clerk/Auditor Alaina Lofgran is accused of allowing ballots to be shredded soon after the 2022 election in violation of a law requiring their preservation for at least 22 months. The law is for aiding recounts.

A Republican, Lofgran was Juab County clerk from 2015 to this year. She did not seek reelection in 2022."

Was it your intention to point out that a Republican was responsible for this?
 
#3,347
#3,347
BreatheUT said:
You're missing the bigger picture. To want fair elections has nothing to do with Trump. It should be at the core of any modern society.
Click to expand...

The only ones whining about unfair elections are the ones who didn't like the outcome and that drank from Trumps "rigged" poison well long before the election started.

At some point, when everyone in trumps "rigged" orbit says "yeah we knew it wasn't rigged and that he lost" you're going to have to stop grasping at those straws and face reality.

Stop fronting, you're mad because you were told that there would be cheating, trump lost and then bought the narrative that you couldn't possibly have been wrong and therefore there was cheating.

Trump is a professional victim and you keep buying it.

Wise up.

He's a fraud and supporting that bozo is going to get Biden re-elected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill, GordonC and BigOrangeMojo
#3,348
#3,348
Septic said:
"Former Juab County Clerk/Auditor Alaina Lofgran is accused of allowing ballots to be shredded soon after the 2022 election in violation of a law requiring their preservation for at least 22 months. The law is for aiding recounts.

A Republican, Lofgran was Juab County clerk from 2015 to this year. She did not seek reelection in 2022."

Was it your intention to point out that a Republican was responsible for this?
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter who does it; you run elections and handle the documentation as the rules require. The real problem is there are basically two sides to every election, and one side isn't going to support a review. This is no different from bent officiating at a sporting event. The play calling may be atrocious, but only one side is going to complain about it. Issues such as this need to be viewed from a neutral standpoint - one where the winner doesn't get a chance to in any way block or cover any indiscretions. Review doesn't mean just re-adding numbers to verify that they add up again. We're as bad as any third world country when it comes to running an election. We finally got the issue of verifying voters by photo ID under control, and then trashed it with an "emergency" situation.
 
#3,349
#3,349
AM64 said:
Doesn't matter who does it; you run elections and handle the documentation as the rules require. The real problem is there are basically two sides to every election, and one side isn't going to support a review. This is no different from bent officiating at a sporting event. The play calling may be atrocious, but only one side is going to complain about it. Issues such as this need to be viewed from a neutral standpoint - one where the winner doesn't get a chance to in any way block or cover any indiscretions. Review doesn't mean just re-adding numbers to verify that they add up again. We're as bad as any third world country when it comes to running an election. We finally got the issue of verifying voters by photo ID under control, and then trashed it with an "emergency" situation.
Click to expand...


There has been a review. About 60 of them.

Nada. Zilch. Zero.
 
#3,350
#3,350
lawgator1 said:
There has been a review. About 60 of them.

Nada. Zilch. Zero.
Click to expand...

You mean they took the same data and added it again and got roughly the same number. I'm talking a review that looks at the voter rolls and goes from there. One that looks into how mail in ballots were verified before being dumped into a hopper. One that looks to see how ballots were distributed - by request or some sort of mumbo jumbo operation - like how many went to residences where the voter no longer lives - how many residences are vacant lots, etc. The qualifications of people who "verified" signatures ... and if there is any means to reverify the signatures. Does the counting system tag the ballot number with the vote and then verify that the ballot number isn't duplicated or for some other reason such as signature mismatch counted while considered invalid.

The whole damn operation is sloppy beyond belief. Look at the women taking huge bags and everybody with cellphones in the counting areas in Atlanta ... the place with no observers because a "pipe burst" and everybody was sent home - and then some select people recalled. If that kind of thing doesn't conflict with what you think rules of evidence should be, I'd have to ask why not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne, whodeycin85, Orangeburst and 1 other person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top