lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 72,296
- Likes
- 42,685
You mean they took the same data and added it again and got roughly the same number. I'm talking a review that looks at the voter rolls and goes from there. One that looks into how mail in ballots were verified before being dumped into a hopper. One that looks to see how ballots were distributed - by request or some sort of mumbo jumbo operation - like how many went to residences where the voter no longer lives - how many residences are vacant lots, etc. The qualifications of people who "verified" signatures ... and if there is any means to reverify the signatures. Does the counting system tag the ballot number with the vote and then verify that the ballot number isn't duplicated or for some other reason such as signature mismatch counted while considered invalid.
The whole damn operation is sloppy beyond belief. Look at the women taking huge bags and everybody with cellphones in the counting areas in Atlanta ... the place with no observers because a "pipe burst" and everybody was sent home - and then some select people recalled. If that kind of thing doesn't conflict with what you think rules of evidence should be, I'd have to ask why not.
Good luck with that.