Nope just pointing out why you believe what you do...if it didn't involve Trump I have every belief you and I would be agreeing and you wouldn't be dismissing...I can tell without involving trump your smart enough to see it but because of your hatred for a man you never personally met..your dug in an nothing will change your mind.Deflection and redirection is your best move at this point.
Well played?
I'm pretty sure Time magazine could write an article about rigging an election and some people still wouldn't believe there was fraud because it was against Trump..its an amazing phenomenon and will be a study in how to propagandize educated idiots
Nope just pointing out why you believe what you do...if it didn't involve Trump I have every belief you and I would be agreeing and you wouldn't be dismissing...I can tell without involving trump your smart enough to see it but because of your hatred for a man you never personally met..your dug in an nothing will change your mind.
So if a flash mob robs a Walgreens and no one get prosecuted did it happen??? That's what your saying....the voting committee admitted those issues....amount to enough votes that is would have effected the outcome..but if no one prosecuted it...it never happened right?? Crime is down in NYC...DA announces they won't prosecuted certain crimes..so those crime never happened...maybe I gave you to much creditProof would change my mind.
When you get it, trot it into a court room and shock the world.
I'll hang up and listen.
Did Time write an article?? Yes..yet you refuse to believe that a coordinated effort to keep Trump from being reelected thru fraud is not possible...yet you just watched an entire media cover for Biden being mentally deficient and flat out lied. .Donny was planting the seed of fraud long before the election was even held. He's never lost anything in his life straight up, when he does lose - it's only because something was "rigged."
You maga bozos bought into the lie before he even knew he needed to use it.
Is there evidence of a robbery? Missing items? Witnesses?So if a flash mob robs a Walgreens and no one get prosecuted did it happen??? That's what your saying....the voting committee admitted those issues....amount to enough votes that is would have effected the outcome..but if no one prosecuted it...it never happened right?? Crime is down in NYC...DA announces they won't prosecuted certain crimes..so those crime never happened...maybe I gave you to much credit
Because there is video evidence or someone admitted they did it right??? Like a committee overseeing elections admitting they didn't verify signatures on mail in ballots or them admitting chain of custody, or flat out now missing ballot..all admitted in committee hearing...so the evidence is there that fraud was possible just like evidence is there that Walgreen was robbed..Is there evidence of a robbery? Missing items? Witnesses?
These things are admissible in court as proof.
Your analogy fails there. When a Walgreens is "flash mobbed" there's actual evidence that a crime has been committed.
Did Time write an article?? Yes..yet you refuse to believe that a coordinated effort to keep Trump from being reelected thru fraud is not possible...yet you just watched an entire media cover for Biden being mentally deficient and flat out lied. .
Answer this.....do you believe the DNC is capable of fraudulent voting in order to keep power?? Given what you have seen them covering for Biden, fake Russia...pee tapes??? If you can honestly admit that they are capable. Then the rest is plausible.
Because there is video evidence or someone admitted they did it right??? Like a committee overseeing elections admitting they didn't verify signatures on mail in ballots or them admitting chain of custody, or flat out now missing ballot..all admitted in committee hearing...so the evidence is there that fraud was possible just like evidence is there that Walgreen was robbed..
Never said wide spread..is 50k votes of 150 millions votes widespread??? No..but but less then half that swing AZ and GA.I believe that fraud is possible, sure. I don't see evidence of coordinated widespread fraud that would affect the outcome of the election.
Frankly, I know that fraud is possible.
Georgia Republican Party official voted illegally nine times, judge rules
Brian Pritchard, first vice chairman of the Georgia Republican Party, was fined $5,000 for voting illegally and registering to vote while serving a sentence for a felony, a judge ruled.www.nbcnews.com
A man charged with voter fraud in Florida blames rivalry between Trump and DeSantis supporters
A man has been arrested on forgery and fraud charges after authorities say he cast a ballot in Florida for his deceased father in the 2020 election.apnews.com
Three Republican supporters from Trump-backing Florida arrested for voter fraud
The three have been accused of voting more than once in the 2020 electionswww.independent.co.uk
They are supposed to reach out to the person to correct them...if it's not done the ballot is void...but in 2020 they wasnt proper signature match and those that were caught were pushed thru and not verified by the voter..this again was admitted by the committee as "they didn't have time"..What is the SOP for local jurisdiction where the ballots didn't match?
They are supposed to reach out to the person to correct them...if it's not done the ballot is void...but in 2020 they wasnt proper signature match and those that were caught were pushed thru and not verified by the voter..this again was admitted by the committee as "they didn't have time"..
Speculation because the actual ballots in question are missing or lost in chain of custody....would pushing thru knowing unmatch ballots be an intent to deceive...Fraud implies intent to deceive. Can you state with certainty that all of the non-matching signatures were votes for Joe only? Or can you only speculate?
We can’t see the signatures with the cardboard on the windows. Maybe they will let us check the pelican totes they pulled out from under the table after they sent everyone home.Fraud implies intent to deceive. Can you state with certainty that all of the non-matching signatures were votes for Joe only? Or can you only speculate?
Speculation because the actual ballots in question are missing or lost in chain of custody....would pushing thru knowing unmatch ballots be an intent to deceive...
And believe me I'll be calling for audit for all elections regardless of the winner..even this year if trump wins. And to be completely honest..for me it's the statistically improbable way Biden won. It was like seeing a unicorn in a black hole kinda thing.