Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

#4,102
#4,102
Septic said:
You see what you want to see and hear what you want to hear - your confirmation bias on the subject is clear.

Rational people want to see evidence and proof taken into court. The MAGA big lie mouth pieces went full throttle on social media. Crickets when under oath.
Click to expand...
Your right..if I see ash in the air, burnt charcoal wood, and smoke and the Forestery dept tells there was a forest fire...it's my confirmation bias in thinking there was a forest fire because no proof was presented in court..your absolutely correct...
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
#4,103
#4,103
BigOrangeMojo said:
If someone could prove a coordinated large-scale D scheme to rig the POTUS, the R party would have a supermajority nationally for a decade...

All of the incentive exists for someone to bring proof.....
Click to expand...
Case were brought..were they dimiss r on lack of evidence or standing??? If a court doesn't feel the result of the case harmed who brought it or it brought after the fact it dismissed without a shred of evidence to proof standing..which was the case in almost all of the cases brought...if my understanding is correct of course, I'm not an expert

Why would a governor sign a bill like Whitmer signed for recounts if there was nothing to hide??
 
#4,106
#4,106
whodeycin85 said:
Your right..if I see ash in the air, burnt charcoal wood, and smoke and the Forestery dept tells there was a forest fire...it's my confirmation bias in thinking there was a forest fire because no proof was presented in court..your absolutely correct...
Click to expand...

But you didn't see it.

You were told to believe it by anonymous twitter users. You chose to believe it because it's what you wanted to believe. That's confirmation bias.

Had there been ash in the air, burned wood and smoke - that's ACTUAL evidence of a fire. If you had ACTUAL evidence of a conspiracy or of widespread, election changing fraud, you'd have trotted into court to the adulation of millions.

But you have bupkis. Come to terms with the fact that your belief is based on what you want, not reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RockyTop85 and DuckInAPen
#4,107
#4,107
Septic said:
But you didn't see it.

You were told to believe it by anonymous twitter users. You chose to believe it because it's what you wanted to believe. That's confirmation bias.

Had there been ash in the air, burned wood and smoke - that's ACTUAL evidence of a fire. If you had ACTUAL evidence of a conspiracy or of widespread, election changing fraud, you'd have trotted into court to the adulation of millions.

But you have bupkis. Come to terms with the fact that your belief is based on what you want, not reality.
Click to expand...
I know you were replying to someone else with this regarding other things, so ignore that for this...

Are you under the belief there was absolutely nothing suspicious at all regarding the 2020 Presidential election?
 
#4,108
#4,108
just bob said:
I know you were replying to someone else with this regarding other things, so ignore that for this...

Are you under the belief there was absolutely nothing suspicious at all regarding the 2020 Presidential election?
Click to expand...
There are always irregularities with elections. The extent of it has never been questioned like it has since Trump was in office. That's a fact. There's been plenty of documented fraud, and adjudicated as such against Republicans. Same with Democrats. You do know, because this is fact, that Trump spent taxpayer dollars in 2017 to investigate the election because he lost the popular vote? They found nothing to take to court. Trump is such a facking hypersensitive clown that he was bothered by losing the popular vote, which doesn't matter. Trump's great accomplishment as POTUS was exposing our dumbest citizens
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN Ribs
#4,109
#4,109
BernardKingGOAT said:
There are always irregularities with elections. The extent of it has never been questioned like it has since Trump was in office. That's a fact. There's been plenty of documented fraud, and adjudicated as such against Republicans. Same with Democrats. You do know, because this is fact, that Trump spent taxpayer dollars in 2017 to investigate the election because he lost the popular vote? They found nothing to take to court. Trump is such a facking hypersensitive clown that he was bothered by losing the popular vote, which doesn't matter. Trump's great accomplishment as POTUS was exposing our dumbest citizens
Click to expand...
Thank you @Septic for this senseless, meaningless diatribe via proxy poster. Perhaps you'd be kind enough to grace us with your presence?
 
#4,110
#4,110
BernardKingGOAT said:
There are always irregularities with elections. The extent of it has never been questioned like it has since Trump was in office. That's a fact. There's been plenty of documented fraud, and adjudicated as such against Republicans. Same with Democrats. You do know, because this is fact, that Trump spent taxpayer dollars in 2017 to investigate the election because he lost the popular vote? They found nothing to take to court. Trump is such a facking hypersensitive clown that he was bothered by losing the popular vote, which doesn't matter. Trump's great accomplishment as POTUS was exposing our dumbest citizens
Click to expand...
This weird response for a post that wasn't even for you is a red flag in freaking out. You're aiding your enemy....lol
 
#4,111
#4,111
just bob said:
This weird response for a post that wasn't even for you is a red flag in freaking out. You're aiding your enemy....lol
Click to expand...
I reread it. Sounds like a calm response to me. You're so far gone that you assign "red flags" to a factual response. Even worse, you use the term "enemy". WTF? No one is an "enemy" of anyone else in this forum, except in the eyes of dumbass, tribal clowns. A wet grip on reality would be a huge improvement for you
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
#4,112
#4,112
BernardKingGOAT said:
I reread it. Sounds like a calm response to me. You're so far gone that you assign "red flags" to a factual response. Even worse, you use the term "enemy". WTF? No one is an "enemy" of anyone else in this forum, except in the eyes of dumbass, tribal clowns. A wet grip on reality would be a huge improvement for you
Click to expand...
You offered nothing, just talking points response sans facts. You're just walking, talking extreme left garbage. Have a nice day.
 
#4,113
#4,113
just bob said:
Thank you @Septic for this senseless, meaningless diatribe via proxy poster. Perhaps you'd be kind enough to grace us with your presence?
Click to expand...
Septic??? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Yes, some of the middle 50 drift in and out of here. Yes, they're all smarter, more informed and more accomplished than you. Most of them anyway.

You could have helped yourself by responding to the subject matter with an informed rebuttal.
 
#4,114
#4,114
just bob said:
You offered nothing, just talking points response sans facts. You're just walking, talking extreme left garbage. Have a nice day.
Click to expand...
There's nothing "left" about my post. Yes, it is left of you. That puts me in the middle. Find a post of mine to affirm your characterization of me or STFU or continue to get hammered. Your choice
 
#4,115
#4,115
BernardKingGOAT said:
Septic??? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Yes, some of the middle 50 drift in and out of here. Yes, they're all smarter, more informed and more accomplished than you. Most of them anyway.

You could have helped yourself by responding to the subject matter with an informed rebuttal.
Click to expand...
I knew exactly who I was responding to, he as well....

You're a really weird dude. I need to come up with my weird index because you're definitely on there.
 
#4,116
#4,116
BernardKingGOAT said:
There's nothing "left" about my post. Yes, it is left of you. That puts me in the middle. Find a post of mine to affirm your characterization of me or STFU or continue to get hammered. Your choice
Click to expand...
Weird to post multiple replies to a singly post like you did. You're not thinking. I've seen your posts before, you're extreme left. Extremist.
 
#4,117
#4,117
just bob said:
I knew exactly who I was responding to, he as well....

You're a really weird dude. I need to come up with my weird index because you're definitely on there.
Click to expand...
Thanks. I love that you think I'm weird.

Being considered "weird" by your ilk is feather I don't really deserve
 
#4,119
#4,119
just bob said:
I know you were replying to someone else with this regarding other things, so ignore that for this...

Are you under the belief there was absolutely nothing suspicious at all regarding the 2020 Presidential election?
Click to expand...

Enough to sway the election, no. For 3 years, I have posted how Trump didnt lose the election because of what happened in Detroit, Atlanta, or Phoenix proper.


Trump lost because he historically underperformed in R led suburban and exurban areas around Atl, Phoenix, and Detroit. Those are the facts. Trump is the POTUS today if he performed as well as other Rs in those areas during the same elections and if he did as well in those areas as he did in 2016.

The premise that Dems went across the country to hundreds of suburban/exurban areas run by Rs, staffed by Rs, enforced by Rs and ran a widespread fraud ring is nonsensical. If they were going to so that, they would do it in areas they control but facts are, Trump performed similarly or better in those D controlled area vs 2016, 2012, 2008, 2004...

Facts are suburban and exurban R voters abandoned him at a historic clip and he wants to deflect blame because he is so insecure...
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckInAPen
#4,120
#4,120
BigOrangeMojo said:
Enough to sway the election, no. For 3 years, I have posted how Trump didnt lose the election because of what happened in Detroit, Atlanta, or Phoenix proper.


Trump lost because he historically underperformed in R led suburban and exurban areas around Atl, Phoenix, and Detroit. Those are the facts. Trump is the POTUS today if he performed as well as other Rs in those areas during the same elections and if he did as well in those areas as he did in 2016.

The premise that Dems went across the country to hundreds of suburban/exurban areas run by Rs, staffed by Rs, enforced by Rs and ran a widespread fraud ring is nonsensical. If they were going to so that, they would do it in areas they control but facts are, Trump performed similarly or better in those D controlled area vs 2016, 2012, 2008, 2004...

Facts are suburban and exurban R voters abandoned him at a historic clip and he wants to deflect blame because he is so insecure...
Click to expand...
Another weird one.
 
#4,125
#4,125
Septic said:
I believe voter ID is a great idea and also that there wasn't the widespread fraud you desperately want everyone to believe there was.

That must blow your mind.

You maga guys are sore losers.
Click to expand...

Does calling out purposeful gaps in the law intended to prohibit traceability make one a sore loser?


When Darrell Taylor barely touched the Bama QB on the road and they called him for a roughing the passer which led to the game winning TD was UT sore losers? It was a highly questionable and subjective call. We'll never be able to prove it.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top