ajvol01
GBO!
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2009
- Messages
- 25,426
- Likes
- 30,005
https://vote.stanstanart.com/Also, the clerk's name is Stan Stanart and that can't possibly be real
https://vote.stanstanart.com/Also, the clerk's name is Stan Stanart and that can't possibly be real
Am I the only one who finds it strange that the above article was published on October 29, 2020, and the supposed evidence presented for a fraud planned for October 29, 2020 are envelopes postmarked February 13, 2018? Knock, knock, hello. Anybody home? How are the applications for mail in ballots shown to be other than a photocopied blank, filled in by someone ginning up a phony story with a collection of two-and-a-half year old postmarked envelopes?
How about now?They are envelopes postmarked February, 2018. I'm going to repeat this; they are shown as supporting evidence of fraud in the 2020 Election, two-and-a-half years later. Do you not see the problem with that?