Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

[VolinWayne]

 

[SlingBlayde]

The only thing that proves, is how far some Republicans are willing to go, in order to kiss Trump's a$$.

If the Republican state legislature in Texas honestly believes that the 2020 Presidential Election was rigged against Donald Trump, then they should supply evidence in support of such a belief. They have not done that, so that amounts to nothing more than empty rhetoric.

The reason so many Republicans allow Trump to get away with the foolishness that he has, is because they think he is a one off... and we will never see anyone like him again, especially from the Democratic Party side. They are wrong. There will be copycats from the Democratic Party side, and when that happens, Republicans won't have any moral high ground on which to stand, because they didn't have the courage to stand up to Trump.

I believe they watched 2000 Mules. Plenty of proof there (and the fact checkers are full of crap).

 

[whodeycin85]

I believe they watched 2000 Mules. Plenty of proof there (and the fact checkers are full of crap).

Haven't we learned yet that. Geo tracking only works on covid, 100 s of affidavits of eye witnesses mean nothing unless done by a democrat same with hearsay....only democracy witnesses are to be believed even when the actual involved say the opposite....

 

[whodeycin85]

I believe they watched 2000 Mules. Plenty of proof there (and the fact checkers are full of crap).

Haven't we learned yet that. Geo tracking only works on covid, 100 s of affidavits of eye witnesses mean nothing unless done by a democrat same with hearsay....only democracy witnesses are to be believed even when the actual involved say the opposite....

 

[BowlBrother85]

I believe they watched 2000 Mules. Plenty of proof there (and the fact checkers are full of crap).

William Barr is not a fact-checker. He was Donald Trump's own Attorney General. The person who is full of crap .... is YOU.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Haven't we learned yet that. Geo tracking only works on covid, 100 s of affidavits of eye witnesses mean nothing unless done by a democrat same with hearsay....only democracy witnesses are to be believed even when the actual involved say the opposite....

.... and apparently, as far as Republicans/Conservatives/Trump supporters are concerned, biased media can only favor Democrats.

Dinesh D'Souza is the filmmaker responsible for the documentary "2,000 Mules." D'Souza can hardly be described as an objective political commentator. He is basically the Michael Moore of the right-wing. D'Souza would make cable news appearances throughout Barack Obama's presidency where he was frequently critical of Obama for governing by way of executive orders, playing too much golf, and for his bloated budget proposals. However, these were all criticisms which could have been equally applied to Donald Trump's presidency as well... but at least as far as D'Souza was concerned, they never were. D'Souza completely ignored the fact that Trump was doing the same things.

Media bias is a one way street for Republicans/Conservatives/Trump supporters. You are dismissive of media outlets such as The Washington Post and The New York Times for being biased in favor of Democrats, but you completely trust and aggressively defend every allegation made in a documentary produced by a right-wing extremist like Dinesh D'Souza? That is not consistent.

What this proves, is that Republicans/Conservatives/Trump supporters don't really mind media bias at all ... as long as the bias is favorable to the Republican Party.

 

[NurseGoodVol]

I know Georgia was one. I think Wisconsin and one more for sure that there was video of trash bags being brought out from hidden areas before they were finished “counting”.

Try the wayback machine, it preserves deleted videos.

 

[BowlBrother85]

That’s the kind of remark that forces me to defend him. He wasn’t
all about himself. The man didn’t take a dime for his service! Are you kidding me? He donated every penny to American Vets! But you call him selfish.

Now I’m not saying he was perfect. But I am saying he wasn’t about himself because HE gained nothing.

This is ignorant. No president has ever engaged in acts of self-enrichment to the extremes that Trump did.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Try the wayback machine, it preserves deleted videos.

Is there a wayback machine for videos which never existed?

 

[Orangeburst]

This is ignorant. No president has ever engaged in acts of self-enrichment to the extremes that Trump did.

Trump fell of the Forbes 400 List for the first time in 25 years in 2021..taking losses for 5 years straight since the year he was inaugurated,
Please share how he enriched himself..Go ahead. And dont bring up some nonsense like hotel room occupancy

 

[1vol8]

This is ignorant. No president has ever engaged in acts of self-enrichment to the extremes that Trump did.

Ignorant is simply not knowing. Stupid is knowing the truth and willingly believing a lie. Which makes you stupid given the fact that someone literally posted Forbes opinion on the subject and yet here you are spewing this BS. Don’t argue with with me. Call Forbes and tell them how wrong THEY are. I’m sure they would be very interested to hear your “facts” and how you can explain away how he profited despite his 2 billion net worth loss.

 

[VolinWayne]

Trump fell of the Forbes 400 List for the first time in 25 years in 2021..taking losses for 5 years straight since the year he was inaugurated,
Please share how he enriched himself..Go ahead. And dont bring up some nonsense like hotel room occupancy

He chooses to ignore all of the examples of corruption with Joe and his crackhead son. I would love to know how many millions of the Ukraine "funding" makes its way back into the pockets of our politicians (Republicans and Democrats)

 

[SlingBlayde]

William Barr is not a fact-checker. He was Donald Trump's own Attorney General. The person who is full of crap .... is YOU.

LOL, Barr didn't find any election fraud because he DIDN'T LOOK! All I can say is Trump didn't always do a good job picking staff. Much better than the clown show Biden has going on but still not the best.

Just Google "Bill Barr Corrupt". Even the fake news was putting out hit pieces on him back in 2020. The moment he doesn't support Trump, he becomes their love child. The crap is back on you

 

[BowlBrother85]

LOL, Barr didn't find any election fraud because he DIDN'T LOOK! All I can say is Trump didn't always do a good job picking staff. Much better than the clown show Biden has going on but still not the best.

Just Google "Bill Barr Corrupt". Even the fake news was putting out hit pieces on him back in 2020. The moment he doesn't support Trump, he becomes their love child. The crap is back on you

William Barr was nothing less than a faithful servant to Donald Trump, while he was the Attorney General. Barr did his best to spin the findings of the Mueller probe into a favorable resolution for Trump. Barr also appointed John Durham as Special Counsel to investigate the origins of the Russia probe investigation, as Trump requested. He didn't have to do that.

You are projecting, with these last two sentences.

In reality, Barr performed his duties as Attorney General, exactly as Donald Trump wanted him to ... up until two months prior to the election, when Barr wouldn't announce an investigation into the Biden's, as Trump had requested on Twitter, and Barr wouldn't publicly describe the election results as being "fraudulent" in December, when he had no proof that they were.

Just as had been the case with Mike Pence, William Barr was very popular with Trump supporters, up until the moment he wouldn't help him overturn the outcome of the election. This is the height of irrational behavior. Trump turned against his allies, because they wouldn't lie for him. And you think the problem is with Barr? Grow up.

 

[SlingBlayde]

William Barr was nothing less than a faithful servant to Donald Trump, while he was the Attorney General. Barr did his best to spin the findings of the Mueller probe into a favorable resolution for Trump. Barr also appointed John Durham as Special Counsel to investigate the origins of the Russia probe investigation, as Trump requested. He didn't have to do that.

You are projecting, with these last two sentences.

In reality, Barr performed his duties as Attorney General, exactly as Donald Trump wanted him to ... up until two months prior to the election, when Barr wouldn't announce an investigation into the Biden's, as Trump had requested on Twitter, and Barr wouldn't publicly describe the election results as being "fraudulent" in December, when he had no proof that they were.

Just as had been the case with Mike Pence, William Barr was very popular with Trump supporters, up until the moment he wouldn't help him overturn the outcome of the election. This is the height of irrational behavior. Trump turned against his allies, because they wouldn't lie for him. And you think the problem is with Barr? Grow up.

I think the problem is with the entire system (dirty voter rolls, corrupt election officials (remember how they kicked out poll observers), compromised voting machines, etc.). Requesting to pause the process and send back to the states for verification in light of new information is not the same as requesting an overturn. When Trump called Kemp, he was looking at a report that showed thousands of dead voters, thousands of illegals, duplicate addresses, etc. I would have questioned the results myself. Now they are trying to indict him for it.
Soooo much more fraud information has come out since late 2020/2021. You are either in denial, gullible, stupid or all three.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Trump fell of the Forbes 400 List for the first time in 25 years in 2021..taking losses for 5 years straight since the year he was inaugurated,
Please share how he enriched himself..Go ahead.

The Forbes statistic is completely irrelevant to the subject of Donald Trump's emolument's clause violations, which is what I was talking about, Of course, I don't mind sharing with you how he enriched himself. I don't make accusations on here that I can't support all day long with one linked source after another. I post more videos, and link more articles than anyone else on here by far... and you would have to know that, if you are familiar with my posting history.

. Which makes you stupid given the fact that someone literally posted Forbes opinion on the subject and yet here you are spewing this BS. Don’t argue with with me. Call Forbes and tell them how wrong THEY are. I’m sure they would be very interested to hear your “facts” and how you can explain away how he profited despite his 2 billion net worth loss.

That Forbes stat is meaningless to the question of whether or not Trump committed a multitude of emolument's clause violations... which he absolutely did and I can easily prove.

Profiting off the Presidency: Trump’s Violations of the Emoluments Clauses | ACS

I have 12 links concerning Donald Trump's emolument's clause violations to choose from, but with this being such important subject matter, I only want to link those which can't be accused of political partisanship. So, this will take some time, to sort through.

The link up above is to the American Constitution Society. This is the same organization which argued that President Barack Obama should be impeached and removed from office in 2014, because he was governing by way of executive orders, and in the process of doing so, circumventing Congressional authority.

So, don't try pulling the old "that is a biased liberal media source" bull $hit with that link. I specifically chose that organization as a source, because they are NOT a media outlet, and they have a history of trashing both sides of the aisle evenly.

 

[Orangeburst]

The Forbes statistic is completely irrelevant to the subject of Donald Trump's emolument's clause violations, which is what I was talking about, Of course, I don't mind sharing with you how he enriched himself. I don't make accusations on here that I can't support all day long with one linked source after another. I post more videos, and link more articles than anyone else on here by far... and you would have to know that, if you are familiar with my posting history.


That Forbes stat is meaningless to the question of whether or not Trump committed a multitude of emolument's clause violations... which he absolutely did and I can easily prove.

Profiting off the Presidency: Trump’s Violations of the Emoluments Clauses | ACS

I have 12 links concerning Donald Trump's emolument's clause violations to choose from, but with this being such important subject matter, I only want to link those which can't be accused of political partisanship. So, this will take some time, to sort through.

The link up above is to the American Constitution Society. This is the same organization which argued that President Barack Obama should be impeached and removed from office in 2014, because he was governing by way of executive orders, and in the process of doing so, circumventing Congressional authority.

So, don't try pulling the old "that is a biased liberal media source" bull $hit with that link. I specifically chose that organization as a source, because they are NOT a media outlet, and they have a history of trashing both sides of the aisle evenly.

You said enrich himself.
For someone who plays the semantic game and all.
Do you need to go look the definition up?
And another thing learn what GIGO means with all your verified sources

 

[BowlBrother85]

I think the problem is with the entire system (dirty voter rolls, corrupt election officials (remember how they kicked out poll observers), compromised voting machines, etc.). Requesting to pause the process and send back to the states for verification in light of new information is not the same as requesting an overturn. When Trump called Kemp, he was looking at a report that showed thousands of dead voters, thousands of illegals, duplicate addresses, etc. I would have questioned the results myself. Now they are trying to indict him for it.
Soooo much more fraud information has come out since late 2020/2021. You are either in denial, gullible, stupid or all three.

This is 100% bull $hit.

The problem is, was, and will always be Donald Trump ... and the brain dead sheep, such as yourself, who believe everything he says, in spite of the mountain of evidence revealing Trump to be a pathological liar.

 

[BowlBrother85]

You said enrich himself.
For someone who plays the semantic game and all.
Do you need to go look the definition up?
And another thing learn what GIGO means with all your verified sources

The fact that his golf and hotel properties lost money due to the politicization of his brand (poor, uneducated, rednecks don't comprise Trump Corporation patronage? Who would have thought? LOL!), and to COVID, has nothing to do with his financial ambitions as the President of the United States, which were to use the office as much as possible, to steer business to his properties. He even tried to have the G 7 Summit moved to his Doral property in 2019. That took some audacity.

 

[SlingBlayde]

This is 100% bull $hit.

The problem is, was, and will always be Donald Trump ... and the brain dead sheep, such as yourself, who believe everything he says, in spite of the mountain of evidence revealing Trump to be a pathological liar.

Uhhh, I very rarely listen to Trump. Don't care about his words, only his actions. I watched the state legislature testimonies to form my opinions about fraud as well as all of the statistical and video evidence that's come out since (big believer in statistics). You're brain dead for believing everything the MSM says so back at you. Time will continue to move on. And, as time progresses, more and more evidence will continue to come out. It always does. Not going to argue with you any further.

 

[BowlBrother85]

the statistical and video evidence that's come out since

I tell you what ....

I've been posting links and videos which de-bunk every conceivable conspiracy theory possible concerning the 2020 Presidential Election for over a year now. I literally have a trove of over 100 links I can post ... So why don't you post one of these statistics and one of these videos that you have faith in, and then sit back and watch me completely obliterate them with at least 5 YouTube videos, and 10 linked articles from major media outlets, in about 15 minutes?

This should be fun!

 

[SlingBlayde]

I tell you what ....

I've been posting links and videos which de-bunk every conceivable conspiracy theory possible concerning the 2020 Presidential Election for over a year now. I literally have a trove of over 100 links I can post ... So why don't you post one of these statistics and one of these videos that you have faith in, and then sit back and watch me completely obliterate them with at least 5 YouTube videos, and 10 linked articles from major media outlets, in about 15 minutes?

This should be fun!

You just made my point. Thanks!

 

[BreatheUT]

Barry Morphew pleads guilty in 2020 voter fraud case

Strange and unfortunate case looking at big picture. I'm glad this was investigated and was easy to identify because this missing wife was a public issue.

I think all cases of potential voter fraud should be investigated without obstruction and full transparency of independent bodies.

 

[BowlBrother85]

You just made my point. Thanks!

LOL. You aren't even going to post what you were talking about? That is some weak $hit right there.

 

[BreatheUT]

William Barr is not a fact-checker. He was Donald Trump's own Attorney General. The person who is full of crap .... is YOU.

Barr is correct in his assessment. He has to stand by the things that have been proven or not proven to date. That is the difference between a pragmatic, conservative professional and an emotional bleeding heart progressive unprofessional.

As for your post. The fact that you are quoting lying Fauci of all people demonstrates you are like the boy who cries wolf.

All of your posts reek of a person who sensationalize and use conjecture at every time. It reminds me of the posters on our sports board who say about every recruit we get - "He's a beast" or "He's underrated" whether it's a 5-star or walk-on.