Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

That is a joke. Trump was all about himself, when he steered diplomats to his D.C. Hotel and forced his Secret Service detail to stay at his properties in Florida and Scotland at taxpayer expense. Trump's presidency was littered with emoluments clause violations and nepotism. Ivanka had an office in the West Wing for f*** sake. A more egotistical person has never held public office in the United States.

... and the videos and links I posted in post # 2,334 were to valid sources such as Newsweek and ABC News. You don't get to dismiss every source which reports news damaging to Trump as biased, without at least explaining what they got wrong in their reporting.

I don't believe for a minute that you have taken the time to review the content of post #2,334.
I rest case. Just swallow man. It taste great and less filling
 
So you’re the normal one?
Just an average every day guy. I'm middle class, I don't care enough about sports to drop 1k on tickets and hotels and food. Rather watch on tv with my own beer and food. And I damn sure ain't attending a political rally. Don't care who it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1vol8
Just an average every day guy. I'm middle class, I don't care enough about sports to drop 1k on tickets and hotels and food. Rather watch on tv with my own beer and food. And I damn sure ain't attending a political rally. Don't care who it is.
Earlier in this thread I made mention that no one thinks they’re crazy. I don’t go to political rallies either or many sporting events but that doesn’t mean I think those that do are not normal everyday people just like you. I think people that go to political rallies are firm in their beliefs and want to be as well informed as possible. They probably spend a good % their lives reading and listening to everything they can about the party they support. Those that go to sporting events have the time and money and enjoy crowds more than the solitude you find at home. That makes them different. But no less normal than anyone else.
 
I don't post any claims on here that I haven't already linked to sources of information. These are not my words. I posted 5 YouTube videos and 12 links in post # 2,334 of this thread, which includes this quote from Warren Buffett multiple times :

"It's apparent that it is a strategic component of the Trump Organization's business formula, to contest payment to contractors deep into litigation. That is a risky proposition, but it has proven sustainable for him."

-- Warren Buffett, CEO, Berkshire Hathaway

I realize that you don't know who Warren Buffett is, but you can Google him...
I would be very hesitant to put stock in what Buffett and Gates (not that you mentioned him) say publicly about policy or people.
1.) Being in anyway pro Trump is bad for PR
2.) That means automatically being negative is good for PR
3.) Both of these men will say things like "of course I should pay more in taxes" but are lying their ass off. They know it's a terrible look for them to say something different. If they wanted to pay more they could. They take every deduction they can. I would too.

At the end of the day they are solely focused on protecting their image and their companies. *****ing on Trump is easy. The truth is he has no clue. He just knows the accusations.
 
I rest case. Just swallow man. It taste great and less filling
If you would accuse Newsweek and ABC News of an anti-Trump bias, then you would say that about any source, which wasn't actively promoting the Trump brand like Breitbart or The Federalist. You are like Alabama football fans accusing Gary Danielson of bias. "You're either for us or against us."

Bottom line : to accuse ABC or Newsweek of bias ... is ridiculous.
 
I would be very hesitant to put stock in what Buffett and Gates (not that you mentioned him) say publicly about policy or people.
1.) Being in anyway pro Trump is bad for PR
2.) That means automatically being negative is good for PR
3.) Both of these men will say things like "of course I should pay more in taxes" but are lying their ass off. They know it's a terrible look for them to say something different. If they wanted to pay more they could. They take every deduction they can. I would too.

At the end of the day they are solely focused on protecting their image and their companies. *****ing on Trump is easy. The truth is he has no clue. He just knows the accusations.
You might have a point there, if there weren't so many examples of Trump's non-payment to employees to point toward. Those links and videos (which you guys won't actually look at) delve into many of them. There are too many examples for this to be dismissed as just a customary practice within the industry.
 


Thanks for posting this. I finally took the time to listen to the entire presentation. This pretty much confirms the absolute mess we have in GA in regards to elections.
A few things that really stood out to me were missing ballot images. How can anybody defend this. Also the fact that VoterGA is being blocked from reviewing Georgia’s original ballots because every county in Georgia has been told to deny VoterGA’s open records requests by the Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.

So much for transparency in our public elections!…"
 
Thanks for posting this. I finally took the time to listen to the entire presentation. This pretty much confirms the absolute mess we have in GA in regards to elections.
A few things that really stood out to me were missing ballot images. How can anybody defend this. Also the fact that VoterGA is being blocked from reviewing Georgia’s original ballots because every county in Georgia has been told to deny VoterGA’s open records requests by the Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.

So much for transparency in our public elections!…"
Yes, but the media and libtards on this board say there was no fraud! Yeah right. Our voting system is so jacked up. We are a banana republic but don’t know it yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
Yes, but the media and libtards on this board say there was no fraud! Yeah right. Our voting system is so jacked up. We are a banana republic but don’t know it yet.


It is indeed jacked up. The sad thing is I fear there are also a few grifters out there who have also jumped onto the election integrity bandwagon but they are only in it for the "donations". Hard to know who is worth a dang in politics anymore. I wish we could remove every single person in politics and vote" with paper ballots". Our entire government really needs a total teardown and rebuild
 
  • Like
Reactions: SlingBlayde
It is indeed jacked up. The sad thing is I fear there are also a few grifters out there who have also jumped onto the election integrity bandwagon but they are only in it for the "donations". Hard to know who is worth a dang in politics anymore. I wish we could remove every single person in politics and vote" with paper ballots". Our entire government really needs a total teardown and rebuild
Wholeheartedly agree. I really think most politicians and even people in the media know the 2020 election was rife with fraud but would never admit it. Trump HAD to be removed from office so the end justified the means. Didn't matter about the will of the people. The elites know best. We can all see how that's turning out.
 
I really think most politicians and even people in the media know the 2020 election was rife with fraud but would never admit it. Trump HAD to be removed from office so the end justified the means. Didn't matter about the will of the people.
That is such a crock.

If there was legitimate proof of systemic fraud, significant enough in nature, to have altered the outcome of the 2020 Presidential Election, then it would have been uncovered by one of the many investigations that have been conducted in the year and a half since Donald Trump left office.

Also, ...

The 2 closest states were Georgia and Arizona. Even if you concede both of those states to Donald Trump, that still leaves him 11 electoral college votes short of the necessary 270 to win. This was not a close election. Al Gore had a much better case for being cheated in 2000 than Trump does. Gore's defeat came down to just 538 votes in Florida, where his opponent's brother was also the Governor. However, Gore presided over the formal certification of his own defeat in the United States Capitol. When that same day came for Trump, he presided over a riot at the United States Capitol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: K-town Vol Fan
That is such a crock.

If there was legitimate proof of systemic fraud, significant enough in nature, to have altered the outcome of the 2020 Presidential Election, then it would have been uncovered by one of the many investigations that have been conducted in the year and a half since Donald Trump left office.

Also, ...

The 2 closest states were Georgia and Arizona. Even if you concede both of those states to Donald Trump, that still leaves him 11 electoral college votes short of the necessary 270 to win. This was not a close election. Al Gore had a much better case for being cheated in 2000 than Trump does. Gore's defeat came down to just 538 votes in Florida, where his opponent's brother was also the Governor. However, Gore presided over the formal certification of his own defeat in the United States Capitol. When that same day came for Trump, he presided over a riot at the United States Capitol.
I'm not the only one. Texas Republicans, Langland County Wisconsin and the WI Supreme Court agree not to mention the millions of others across this country.
 
I'm not the only one. Texas Republicans, Langland County Wisconsin and the WI Supreme Court agree not to mention the millions of others across this country.
By Texas Republicans, I assume you mean AG Ken Paxton, who had a silly law suit against Pennsylvania laughed out of court?

Those "millions of others across the country" have not provided legitimate evidence of systemic fraud, significant enough in nature to have altered the outcome of the presidential election.

... and once again, even if you concede Wisconsin to Trump, he still doesn't reach the 270 electoral college votes necessary to win. Sorry, but this just wasn't a close election. Al Gore had a much better case to make in 2000, than Donald Trump and the Republican Party has now.
 
By Texas Republicans, I assume you mean AG Ken Paxton, who had a silly law suit against Pennsylvania laughed out of court?

Those "millions of others across the country" have not provided legitimate evidence of systemic fraud, significant enough in nature to have altered the outcome of the presidential election.

... and once again, even if you concede Wisconsin to Trump, he still doesn't reach the 270 electoral college votes necessary to win. Sorry, but this just wasn't a close election. Al Gore had a much better case to make in 2000, than Donald Trump and the Republican Party has now.
Texas GOP declares Biden illegitimate, demands end to abortion
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
The only thing that proves, is how far some Republicans are willing to go, in order to kiss Trump's a$$.

If the Republican state legislature in Texas honestly believes that the 2020 Presidential Election was rigged against Donald Trump, then they should supply evidence in support of such a belief. They have not done that, so that amounts to nothing more than empty rhetoric.

The reason so many Republicans allow Trump to get away with the foolishness that he has, is because they think he is a one off... and we will never see anyone like him again, especially from the Democratic Party side. They are wrong. There will be copycats from the Democratic Party side, and when that happens, Republicans won't have any moral high ground on which to stand, because they didn't have the courage to stand up to Trump.
 

VN Store



Back
Top