LittleDTO
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2006
- Messages
- 8,422
- Likes
- 4,608
I still don't understand where these big whigs would lose money on a four to eight team playoff.
More Bowls = More money! I think they should somehow keep the bowls while incorporating a 8-team playoff. I also think they are probably going to have to keep some form of a BCS/opinion-based poll in order to distinguish the top 8 seeds in the playoff.
I agree. They could incorporate the bowls into this ideal. It isn't like they would have to change much, and it would give them a chance to get more sponsors. The major 4 bowls, pending fiesta's status, could just rotate who gets the big game every year. I still don't understand why the rose bowl feels that a pac 10 vs big 10 game really matters. Geez, chances are they could just have those two league champs face off in the first round every year or something. Who cares if wisconsin plays the beavers of oregon state.
im a fan of the +1 idea. then, the bowl games wouldnt be watered down.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I am a fan of not having to win your conference twice. Down with the conference title game. We made it without one for years and we could do it again. Play 12 games and then use the BCS rankings to playoff the top 16 teams for a "real" championship. Then the argument will be what is the correct BCS formula to use. Thoughts anyone?
I am a fan of not having to win your conference twice. Down with the conference title game. We made it without one for years and we could do it again. Play 12 games and then use the BCS rankings to playoff the top 16 teams for a "real" championship. Then the argument will be what is the correct BCS formula to use. Thoughts anyone?