Competition is great, but I want to see a starter taking atleast 50% of the camp snaps to build continuity with his backs, receivers, and line.
When you're essentially splitting starting reps between 3+ players, the team is not able to build the continuity with the starter, and that causes issues down the road.
Establish a starter, let 2nd and 3rd string fight it out for a true backup position. Let the team rally around the starter, otherwise you have people picking favorites, teammates preferring one QB over another. This causes rifts with a team...
It's happening at Alabama right now, the team prefers one QB, the coaches prefer another, and it's caused a problem in their locker room
IIRC, Jones honed it down to two late in camp last year. I suspect he'll do the same this year.
I don't think I've heard of a rift. In fact, there were more rumors of grumbling when Fulmer was HC with Crompton behind Ainge. At least publicly, the players say they are ready to play with any of the QB's. Seeing that they elected both Worley and Dobbs to their player council and Peterman is said to be popular with the other players... there doesn't seem to be a problem.