McDad
I can't brain today; I has the dumb.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
- Messages
- 57,167
- Likes
- 120,470
It's not so much a 'generous interpretation of what was written' but an explanation of how what was written applies in respect to the good of the great unwashed.This is a very generous interpretation of what was posted.
Should tax policy benefit people in general equally and if so should it cost people in general equally?
By your standard, some will benefit more while others are required to pay more. Or, to rephrase as your replied, "the people in general" do not experience benefits equally. Correct?It's not so much a 'generous interpretation of what was written' but an explanation of how what was written applies in respect to the good of the great unwashed.
Yes as a goal. No as some can bear a higher rate without it being onerous.
It's not my standard, it's the way things are. If Individuals are taxed according to their income then there will be differences.By your standard, some will benefit more while others are required to pay more. Or, to rephrase as your replied, "the people in general" do not experience benefits equally. Correct?
No doubt. Mark Zuckerberg is second only to Fauci in the number of humans that one person is responsible for harming.Lol. You would be an idiot to believe that's why he was there. The most interesting part of Trump 2.0 is when none of the people his supporters predict will go to jail will even be charged.
This is called 'having a fit'.Women engage in mass 'primal scream' in wake of Trump victory: 'Release our pain'
Remarkable video shows a group of around two dozen adult women screaming at Lake Michigan in the wake of the Nov. 5 election. The group gathered to "release [their] pain."www.foxnews.com
View attachment 701323
Very good.Has anyone made that point? Yes our tax policies today benefit some more than others, i.e. Bezos.