President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

[Orange_Crush]

We’re gonna have to go to the judges on this one.

10.0
9.8
10.0
9.7
9.68
10.0

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Magas don't want the truth, they want hate.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Until abortion comes up.

 

[Orange_Crush]

Magas don't want the truth, they want hate.

Broad-brush hateful comment is ironic.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Magas don't want the truth, they want hate.

Well... Y'all are providing plenty of it.

 

[utvolpj]

You know alot of young kids?. You truly are a dem.

Most regular parents know lots of kids. I'm sure that made more sense in your head before posting it

 

[C-south]

10.0
9.8
10.0
9.7
9.68
10.0

 

[VOLS INC.]

If the federal government doesn't spend $100 trillion dollars researching childhood cancer then you want children to die of cancer. Logic.

Joe promised to cure Cancer before he left office. Did he not get that done?

That rascal. I thought for sure he would make good on that one.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[Majors]

And I watched an entire party happily cutting out research to cure childhood cancer.

cut or eliminated? Your focus should be on the breakdown and the percentage of donations to research vs. admin. So based on your zig zag response we can safely put you down as democrat racist as that was the topic. Along with the one who liked it.

 

[Majors]

Joe promised to cure Cancer before he left office. Did he not get that done?

That rascal. I thought for sure he would make good on that one.

Damn, promises broke

 

[BeardedVol]

If you don't want the federal government to spend $100 trillion dollars researching childhood cancer then you want children to die of cancer. Logic.

Because there is of course zero hypocrisy in using a child cancer survivor as a prop in your political theater, while actively dismantling the research funding that contributed to saving that child's life.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[swampfoxfan]

He's dismantling america

 

[Jxn Vol]

Because there is of course zero hypocrisy in using a child cancer survivor as a prop in your political theater, while actively dismantling the research funding that contributed to saving that child's life.

Why do you love big government?

 

[swampfoxfan]

Because there is of course zero hypocrisy in using a child cancer survivor as a prop in your political theater, while actively dismantling the research funding that contributed to saving that child's life.

It truly amazes me people don't see that.

 

[luthervol]

If you don't want the federal government to spend $100 trillion dollars researching childhood cancer then you want children to die of cancer. Logic.

If you don't want the federal government to spend any dollars supporting the research of childhood cancer then you're kind of okay with it.

 

[VOLS INC.]

cut or eliminated? Your focus should be on the breakdown and the percentage of donations to research vs. admin. So based on your zig zag response we can safely put you down as democrat racist as that was the topic. Along with the one who liked it.

We know the real reason the democrats didn’t stand and applaud. As a party, they hate children.

After months and months of democrats trying to convince a mom to murder her child in the name of “Reproductive Rights” IF the child survives the womb, the democrats move to plan B, trying to convince the mom to alter the child’s genitalia and gender. If that doesn’t work, they want to send them off to die in an endless war against Putin or indoctrinate them in the University system. Unless they are poor black kids. No need to send those kids anywhere. They can just die locally via gang violence in the democrat ran cities.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

what is this insistence with males in female sports? I dont get it..such a policy loser. Is it because they cannot admit they were wrong? Basically throws women under the bus.

Yeah but abortion...

 

[Majors]

Fox really knows how to write a headline for its target audience.

Project Farm to Feminine Hygiene: Enhancing the Textiles Lab for Research, Extension and Scientific Instrumentation for Teaching at Southern University - SOUTHERN UNIV

Menarche, the first occurrence of menstruation, occurs at approximately 12 years of age and ends with menopause at roughly 51 years of age (Norman, 2014). A woman will have a monthly menstrual cycle for about 40 years of her life averaging to about 450 periods over the course of her lifetime...

portal.nifa.usda.gov

Common sense says men can’t menstruate. So astute of you.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

North To Alaska! Except not thru Canada?

LOL. Those roads are as busy as I-95

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

We know the real reason the democrats didn’t stand and applaud. As a party, they hate children.

After months and months of democrats trying to convince a mom to murder her child in the name of “Reproductive Rights” IF the child survives the womb, the democrats move to plan B, trying to convince the mom to alter the child’s genitalia and gender. If that doesn’t work, they want to send them off to die in an endless war against Putin or indoctrinate them in the University system. Unless they are poor black kids. No need to send those kids anywhere. They can just die locally via gang violence in the democrat ran cities.

Preach.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Agriculture? Huh?

 

[Jxn Vol]

Wow, the squealing from the side that is for killing babies before they are born and mutilating them after birth is concerned with childhood cancer.

Ok

 

[swampfoxfan]

cut or eliminated? Your focus should be on the breakdown and the percentage of donations to research vs. admin. So based on your zig zag response we can safely put you down as democrat racist as that was the topic. Along with the one who liked it.

Democrat yes, but how do you come up with racist?
Do you think research needs no administrative support? No facilities? Just stir and mix in a spare bedroom?