President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

That is categorically false. I never once said I would not call anyone dumb.

Please, please, please.................show me where I said that.
You are correct and I apologize. I guess you threw me when you imported the definition of "abnormal" to be "lesser"--especially 'lesser human'.
 
Last edited:
Please get a clue.



The whole "lesser" tangent was simply to show LouderVol that he was wrong.
If we're making up definitions as we go, how would anyone know who is right or wrong? Communication would be impossible.

As was shown, "smarter" and "more talented" are abnormal as well, and they would generally be considered "greater".
 
You got anything good to say about your boy? He's doing wonders for 'Murica, ain't he?

But hey, you still get to hate on the brown and black people and how they're destroying America. You can toast to that.

I know that stung because I got the you’re racist reply 🤣

To answer your question, I think Trump’s approach to the tariffs has not been good. It’s been very chaotic and nobody knows what is going on. Uncertainty is not good for the markets.

The measuring stick, however, is longer than a month or a quarter. I will wait to see what happens. Unlike you, I’m not a party slurper nor do I get swept away by a demagogue. I won’t mind saying Trump screwed it up.
 
I see your point.
You said "abnormal humans" which was the phrasing I took offense to earlier.

I should have responded with "they are normal humans with abnormal athletic abilities."

I guess when it is used in a commentary fashion, it is more palatable.
Eh, a 7’2” man is an abnormal man, so too is a man of 4’2”. I wouldn’t consider either incorrect, or one good and one bad. Just two points at opposite tails.

I understand the apprehension, but I don’t personally view “abnormal” to be anything overly pejorative.

“Weird” would certainly be one where I would be more skeptical.
 
Because there is of course zero hypocrisy in using a child cancer survivor as a prop in your political theater, while actively dismantling the research funding that contributed to saving that child's life.
Misinformation. You’re regurgitating a false talking point. I doubt you know the studies. Or why CNN retracted their fact check.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
no warrant was provided upon request, no reason given. pretty sure both are required in arrests, abducted seems to apply a little better here.

Cops dont need a warrant to arrest bud. Dont even need probable cause. Reasonable suspicion is all they need...and guess who gets to decide what is Reasonable at that moment? You guessed it...the cop.

A cop believed he broke the law and arrested him. He will get his day in court like everyone does. If this dude was abducted, then i have been abducted and later found not guilty myself. Never got reimbursed for my bond money, lawyer fees etc either despite being cleared on those charges in court. What reallly sucks is when i get pulled over for a tail light, go thru a DUI checkpoint etc and a cop types my license # into their computer, those arrest charges pop up on my record despite the fact I was never convicted on the crime. One of them was a drug charge that came back negative for any illegal drugs when the sample was sent to the state crime lab. So when cops see that arrest on my record from 30 years ago as a teenager they always want to search my vehicle. I have let them 3 times as an adult. If you say NO to the search, they will just call the K9 and make him "hit" on your vehicle so they can search it anyway...just without your consent.

There are definitely some problems with our legal system and cops being able to violate our personal rights, but I don't see a better solution to enact as of now. I also dont think this dude got some gross mistreatment...he got treated the same way my buddies and I usually were treated growing up when we encountered LEOs.
 
I love it when a proud member of the victimhood party calls other people whiny little bitches. That’s called projection, a term you clearly need to familiarize yourself with.
I assume, since you referred to hog as part of the victim hood party, that you typically vote Democrat. If so, that party has done nothing but call everyone racsit, sexist, homophobic, Islamophobic, and basically phobic of everything. Hell, Van Jones was on tv last night saying you all screwed yourselves bc of this. He's right. The majority of the country is done caring about being called these names. Especially when it's so often bullshat. Just wanting to excuse being called out for things. Real problems of this nature will be passed over. Why? Bc you idiots excuse poor behavior, laws, actions etc to force silence. That's over and society is no longer giving a shat about the false labels assigned to them by the liberal outrage machine
 
Dude was arrested. He wasn’t “abducted” or “kidnapped”. If the charges are indeed bunk, he’ll be released. The pretense appears shaky, but that doesn’t = kidnapped!

The other one is little more than a ghost story apparently.
Entering a dwelling to arrest someone when there's no warrant or immediate probable cause can reasonably be called abduction. If he's released because the charges are bunk he will have still been abducted. Remember, our freedoms are rare and unique. Let's not be in a rush to discard them just because we dn't like someone's views.
We should know more about the other story before long. At any rate there are other examples there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol
Lol. WTH does that even mean? “You betrayed us when you stopped giving us hundreds of billions of dollars in money and free s***”.
It means what it says. We've pulled the rug out from under their feet by stopping intelligence feeds, the same way Biden pulled the rug from under Afghanistan by stopping air support.
 
Okay, but again, I don't know what the parameters of the DOJ are, for whatever makes him a person of interest. For instance, is he suspected of terrorist affiliation? Looks like he can be held up to 7 days before being charged. Not sure how quickly the person must be afforded legal representation. Green card holders are 'aliens'.


So, yeah, the DOJ must abide by whatever legal parameters apply to the circumstance of his detention. Arrrest. Abduction. Or whatever.
We don't know what that is.
yeah, and we should not be comfortable no knowing what it is.

if Biden's goons pulled a republican out of their home, made up a law on the spot that they were guilty of that denied them their rights, didn't provide a warrant, or a cause for arrest, this forum would be up in arms and bringing up Rudy Ridge.

but yall lap it up when Daddy Trump does it. yall's Gadsden flags need to be changed to "Please tread on me"
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol

VN Store



Back
Top