President Winfrey

#111
#111
OuterBanksVol said:
Given his approval rating is around 37% and falling, fat chance. Anyway, it'll be Pence running for reelection.
Click to expand...

No it's higher. It's about 45 and it will increase. You fools keep pushing russia fantasy.

Hey outerlip, you going to donate the tax money you're getting back to your fed gov?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#113
#113
OuterBanksVol said:
Dude, you are the poster child for closed minded Fox News ****tards everywhere.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/[/QUOTE

Close minded? Thinking with logic and your brain is not close-minded you silly child. it seems you can't think any further without emotions, do you always have to be so touchy feely in making your decisions? so are you going to give your taxes back to the federal government? Since you despise the man who gave it to you?
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#114
#114
omaha_vol said:
OuterBanksVol said:
Dude, you are the poster child for closed minded Fox News ****tards everywhere.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/[/QUOTE

Close minded? Thinking with logic and your brain is not close-minded you silly child. it seems you can't think any further without emotions, do you always have to be so touchy feely in making your decisions? so are you going to give your taxes back to the federal government? Since you despise the man who gave it to you?
Click to expand...

So you are not going to answer his post in which he clearly showed you facts that proved you wrong?

Stomp your feet and deflect. You learned well from your ilk.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#116
#116
volfanhill said:
Probably as qualified as our current President and former President
Click to expand...

Current one yes. Previous no. While I know some less than informed conservatives scoff at a position like editor of Harvard Law Review, but it actually does take a fairly competent AND educated person to do that job well
 
#117
#117
omaha_vol said:
No it's higher. It's about 45 and it will increase. You fools keep pushing russia fantasy.

Hey outerlip, you going to donate the tax money you're getting back to your fed gov?
Click to expand...

With informed citizens, it's not about the Russia thing. It's about having a clown who is unfit for the job. There's no fantasy in his behavior, which BTW, is embarrassing to this country and its citizens. If his behavior doesn't bother you, then you're not much of a patriot
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#118
#118
114VOL said:
With informed citizens, it's not about the Russia thing. It's about having a clown who is unfit for the job. There's no fantasy in his behavior, which BTW, is embarrassing to this country and its citizens. If his behavior doesn't bother you, then you're not much of a patriot
Click to expand...
I guess that I'm not much of a patriot then. The only thing that I've seen that is embarrassing is a bunch of whining crybabies that didn't get their way November 2016.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#119
#119
1972 Grad said:
I guess that I'm not much of a patriot then. The only thing that I've seen that is embarrassing is a bunch of whining crybabies that didn't get their way November 2016.
Click to expand...

And their feigned outrage at everything GOP. Spoiled, aimless, common senseless and directionless bunch. Hopefully maturity kicks in once they realize they have to work to eat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#120
#120
114VOL said:
Current one yes. Previous no. While I know some less than informed conservatives scoff at a position like editor of Harvard Law Review, but it actually does take a fairly competent AND educated person to do that job well
Click to expand...

You greatly exaggerate the level of competency needed to be an editor.
 
#122
#122
Obsessed said:
DIdnt they predict a clinton win?

Lol
Click to expand...

Actually as I recall they predicted like a 70% chance for Clinton to win predicting a 2-3 point win. Or in other words a sizable 30% for Trump to win.

If you would have told most people that Clinton would have won by that amount (which she did) they would have predicted her taking the election.

So to insinuate 538 is untrustworthy in anyway is nothing but well FAKE NEWS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#123
#123
zaqhhh said:
Actually as I recall they predicted like a 70% chance for Clinton to win predicting a 2-3 point win. Or in other words a sizable 30% for Trump to win.

If you would have told most people that Clinton would have won by that amount (which she did) they would have predicted her taking the election.

So to insinuate 538 is untrustworthy in anyway is nothing but well FAKE NEWS.
Click to expand...

My assertion was that polls can’t be trusted and don’t reflect an absolute result.
 
#124
#124
Obsessed said:
My assertion was that polls can’t be trusted and don’t reflect an absolute result.
Click to expand...

The national poll averages were correct though?

How we choose to interpret them is another thing. But Polls definitely are still valid and therefore can be trusted. Statistics don't lie, people can however.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#125
#125
Part of the polling problem is that people are embarrassed to admit they are stupid and will vote for him (the first time, or again).

So they lie (like he does).

In that sense it is poetic... lie about voting for a liar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top