Proof of the election fraud

[BowlBrother85]

Oh i suffered through it all right. Maybe you need to watch it AGAIN with just a wee bit of healthy skepticism

I have posted 3 videos and 4 other links which all de-bunk your silly claims. Perhaps, it is you who should be a little more skeptical... where are your links? Exactly.

 

[BowlBrother85]

I think it is hilarious that people don’t find it even a tiny bit suspicious that „an urgent phone call“ resulted in vote counting resuming shortly after the election observers were „accidentally“ sent home due to a „burst pipe“ that didn’t actually exist. Yup, it’s going to be „urgent“ activity when you know you have only about 60 minutes of unsupervised counting time available. Nothing to see here folks

You haven't watched the videos. If you had, then you would know that the pipe burst didn't occur on the same night that you are talking about people being sent home.

 

[OrangeTsar]

There was substantial depth to the report.... You just don't want to believe their conclusions.

I don’t know anything for certain one way or the other except that this was sloppy beyond belief and presented amble opportunity for either mistakes or fraud. No evidence that either occurred. But the election officials didn’t help themselves one bit by not following protocol. You stop counting when there are no observers present. PERIOD. It looks fishy as heck and we have nothing to go on except the word of the people who were to blame for doing it wrong

 

[AM64]

I assume that "Fulton County shenanigans" is a reference to the infamous "suitcase" allegations taken from a surveillance video. The reality is that it was investigated, and de-bunked a long time ago. What we consistently see from Trump and Republicans concerning these various allegations, is that there is no shame when they are caught making false allegations. They just move on to the next lie.



*******************************

Five fraud claims: What investigators found

Surveillance tape breeds false fraud claims in Georgia

Fact check: Georgia 'suitcase' video is missing context

Two Georgia election workers sue far-right website over false fraud allegations

Wow, the fearless fact checkers. Really? Ever watch a Keystone Cops movie?

 

[BowlBrother85]

What CONCLUSIONS? He just accepted every single thing the state investigators told him. All he did was nod and repeat back whatever he was fed. I think he has a future in Russian media

You aren't watching the videos... You are a flat out liar.

 

[OrangeTsar]

You haven't watched the videos. If you had, then you would know that the pipe burst didn't occur on the same night that you are talking about people being sent home.

Sure commrade. I have complete faith in our leaders as well. Your social credit is hereby raised 200 points

 

[BowlBrother85]

Wow, the fearless fact checkers. Really?

Those are links to the AJC, Reuters, Fox5 Atlanta and USA Today. Where are your links?

 

[BowlBrother85]

Sure commrade. I have complete faith in our leaders as well. Your social credit is hereby raised 200 points

You have complete faith in Trump and whatever he wants you to believe. You are an idiot.

 

[OrangeTsar]

Those are links to the AJC, Reuters, Fox5 Atlanta and USA Today. Where are your links?

500 points

 

[OrangeTsar]

You have complete faith in Trump and whatever he wants you to believe. You are an idiot.

I don’t believe Trump either. He is an arrogant mean individual who constantly lies. That doesn’t mean i have to believe Biden automatically does it? Not every conservative is a Trumper. But i don’t expect you to understand that

 

[BowlBrother85]

I don’t believe Trump either. He is an arrogant mean individual who constantly lies. That doesn’t mean i have to believe Biden automatically does it? Not every conservative is a Trumper. But i don’t expect you to understand that

Biden has nothing to do with this. You want to believe that fraud played a role in the outcome of the 2020 election. It didn't.

 

[zeppelin128]

I love how trump can't produce **** but you idiots can. He lost. Accept it. You are worse then vagina hats.

The GOP has the dream set up right now. They will retake the House, and maybe even the Senate, in November, with a track to take the White House in 2024. Yet they still insist on this bulls*it.

 

[VolinWayne]

I'm sure @BowlBrother85 will have no problem at all telling us why this is perfectly legal and not the least bit suspicious. I agreed with him in his argument that Mark Meadows needs to be investigated and prosecuted if he willingly committed this fraud but he will never ever concede its fraud if doesn't directly implicate a Republican.

 

[luthervol]

You have made no point.

So no, you don't realize it; what a surprise.

 

[BowlBrother85]

I'm sure @BowlBrother85 will have no problem at all telling us why this is perfectly legal and not the least bit suspicious. I agreed with him in his argument that Mark Meadows needs to be investigated and prosecuted if he willingly committed this fraud but he will never ever concede its fraud if doesn't directly implicate a Republican.

Those pundits are presenting their own personal guesswork as undeniable proof of election fraud. Regardless of what those people want to believe, it is not clear that fraud is at hand. No district attorney's office would ever file criminal charges, with that video being the only means of proving their case.

Also, 2 things jump out at me here :

1) The pundits in the video seem to be assuming that the woman dropping off ballots is a Democrat. Why is that? Do they know her? They are giddy over the prospect that a Democrat can be seen on video (allegedly!) committing fraud ... but how do they know for sure that she is a Democrat?

2) Why is the woman's face blurred in portions of the video? There should be no fear of a lawsuit ... unless they are making false accusations. Is it possible that they are not 100% confident in these accusations?

 

[RockyTop85]

Those pundits are presenting their own personal guesswork as undeniable proof of election fraud. Regardless of what those people want to believe, it is not clear that fraud is at hand. No district attorney's office would ever file criminal charges, with that video being the only means of proving their case.

Also, 2 things jump out at me here :

1) The pundits in the video seem to be assuming that the woman dropping off ballots is a Democrat. Why is that? Do they know her? They are giddy over the prospect that a Democrat can be seen on video (allegedly!) committing fraud ... but how do they know for sure that she is a Democrat?

2) Why is the woman's face blurred in portions of the video? There should be no fear of a lawsuit ... unless they are making false accusations. Is it possible that they are not 100% confident in these accusations?

Signature requirements and cure provisions

Absentee ballots in Michigan include a return envelope printed with a statement that must be signed by the voter before the ballot is returned. If a voter was unable to mark their own ballot and received assistance in doing so, the person assisting the voter must also sign the envelope. Election officials compare the voter’s signature on the envelope with the voter’s signature on file. An absentee ballot will not be counted if it is missing a required signature or if it is determined that the voter’s signature on the ballot does not match the signature on record.[4][5]

Election administration in Michigan

 

[luthervol]

I don’t believe Trump either. He is an arrogant mean individual who constantly lies. That doesn’t mean i have to believe Biden automatically does it? Not every conservative is a Trumper. But i don’t expect you to understand that

Do you believe Trump legitimately LOST the election?

 

[whodeycin85]

All of this is explained from 1:30 to 3:39 in the video below.

They openly admit they counted into the jight without proper obersvation, and that count was largely democrats votes.... how does that not raise some suspicion? There should be 100% transparency, not 1am unobserved vote tallying

 

[BowlBrother85]

Election administration in Michigan

So, in Michigan, there is a legitimate reason as to why a person delivering someone else's ballot for them might need to sign the envelope. With that being the case, the video doesn't prove forgery at all.

 

[hog88]

Election administration in Michigan

Question. How is a person needing assistance to sign their ballot going to have a matching signature and is the signature of the person assisting on file for a matchup?

 

[BowlBrother85]

They openly admit they counted into the jight without proper obersvation, and that count was largely democrats votes.... how does that not raise some suspicion? There should be 100% transparency, not 1am unobserved vote tallying

Agreed, and the error is admitted. Things didn't run perfectly. They rarely do. This doesn't compare to what happened in Dade and Broward County, Florida in 2000, however.

 

[RockyTop85]

Question. How is a person needing assistance to sign their ballot going to have a matching signature and is the signature of the person assisting on file for a matchup?

I don’t know, but I’m struggling to identify a reason to match the signature of the person doing the assisting. There’s no need, that I’m aware of, to establish their identity. There’s no rule, that I know of, requiring that they be a family member, or that they can only assist one person.

The point of the post was that there is a Michigan law that provides a non-fraud explanation for this. It took me less than 2 minutes to find it, copy and paste into this thread, and even spend some time in edit trying to get the forum to stop separating the subsection title from the text.

This seems like a pretty unreliable news source.

 

[MercyPercy]

Is this the new q thread

 

[RockyTop85]

Is this the new q thread

Every thread is a Q thread now, you pedo.

 

[MercyPercy]

Every thread is a Q thread now, you pedo.

I believe groomer is the new insult, thanks