Gandalf
The Orange/White Wizard
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2012
- Messages
- 7,239
- Likes
- 19,799
They couldn't prove it because most politicians wouldn't know how to wipe their own ass in running an election campaign. You don't ask a cop how to steal from a bank, you ask a very successful thief. But such people are not in the business of giving out advice. Local machines are generally too small and dont see enough action to really understand, especially in tiny town USA. To get real data you need to get a hatchet from a big city, where there are frequent, highly contestable elections (whether general or only primaries) with substantial money involved, so this guy can make a living every cycle. In every qualifying area, there are only a handful or two of those guys and they have absolutely NO interest whatsoever in shining light on their brilliant ideas.
Much of the evidence is gone by now but if I really wanted to find some and I had access, I could. I would simply figure out how I would have done it based on what assets would be available and work backwards, looking for sign.
Finding evidence, however, is not the problem, its presenting that evidence to a court that can determine such evidence constitutes PROOF of fraud that would have or could have been a determinant in (overturning) the election results.
Most of the problem therefore boils down to getting necessary access and to getting it into a court of competent jurisdiction.
As a side note, registration fraud is not necessarily all that helpful by itself. It needs to be paired with a good election day operations (a couple of busses) and absentee ops. Point is, you need to vote for them. Whole point of registering people who are iffy is so that you can monitor their participation levels and once they go dormant, you can start to vote "for them".
