CSpindizzy
Five Star Recruit
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2005
- Messages
- 11,352
- Likes
- 542
Correct me if I'm wrong, but its my understanding the French government also bans the wearing of the Jewish kippahs and Christian crosses in public places. I really have no problem with them banning this since displaying Christian and Jewish religious items are also banned.
I'll go with ignorant and thankfully wouldn't fly over here
They go by the euphemistic term Zones Urbaines Sensibles, or Sensitive Urban Zones, with the even more antiseptic acronym ZUS, and there are 751 of them as of last count.
----------------------------------
What are they? Those places in France that the French state does not control. They range from two zones in the medieval town of Carcassone to twelve in the heavily Muslim town of Marseilles, with hardly a town in France lacking in its ZUS. The ZUS came into existence in late 1996 and according to a 2004 estimate, nearly 5 million people live in them.
---------------------------------
People get mugged, even murdered, in the ZUS, but the media prefer not to write about it. When large-scale rioting erupts and officers and firemen are attacked, the behavior of the thugs is condoned with references to their "poverty" and to the "racism" of the indigenous French. The French media never devote their attention to the bleak situation of intimidation and lawlessness in which 8 percent of the population, including many poor indigenous French, are forced to live. Muslim racism toward the "infidels" is never mentioned.
---------------------------------------
The ZUS exist not only because Muslims wish to live in their own areas according to their own culture and their own Shariah laws, but also because organized crime wants to operate without the judicial and fiscal interference of the French state. In France, Shariah law and mafia rule have become almost identical.
the nanny state at work, we must protect you from yourself and your decisions at all costs.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but its my understanding the French government also bans the wearing of the Jewish kippahs and Christian crosses in public places. I really have no problem with them banning this since displaying Christian and Jewish religious items are also banned.
errr i've seen many crosses and yarmulkes in france. if they've banned them they surely aren't enforcing it. either way it's wrong.
True, but it isn't a requirement for, say, a christian to wear a cross pendant at all times. It's not written in scripture. It is, however, written in scripture for women to be veiled in Islam.
Interestingly, Soad Saleh, a former dean of the female
faculty and Islamic law professor at the most prestigious
Islamic university in the world, Cairo's Al-Azhar, confirmed
that the niqab is not an obligation. Gamal al-Banna, brother
of the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, goes further:
"Neither the Koran, nor the hadith require women to wear
a headscarf."
Why is it wrong?
They don't have a right to protect their culture?
There are also security issues here, like how it is illegal
to have too much tint on the windows of ones car here
in the US.
Why do we insist everybody act like us.
I think banning the damn things is way overdue.
They are part Western Civilization, it is time they
started acting like it.
On June 15, the Prefecture of police force prohibited
the aperitif sausage-plonk (sausage and wine protest
-VH) which Laic Riposte and 22 other organizations
wanted to organize in the district of Drop-in Or, in
Barbès (18th district of Paris), at the time of the
commemoration of the call of June 18, to protest
against the illegal Moslem prayers which have taken
place there each Friday for 15 years. But this same
Prefecture of police force did not intervene to make
respect the law in this district, and put an end to
there these illegal prayers! Indeed, in this Friday
June 18, of the thousands of Moslems, as usual,
the streets Myrha, Polonceau and of the Fishmongers
barred, and occupied them to request there illegally
in public! Mr Michel Gaudin, prefect of police force of
Paris, betrays the French Republic while taking left in
favour of the Moslems blockers streets, and while
refusing to give the order to the police officers to
apply the law and to release these streets!
These illegal Moslem prayers have taken place for
15 years, without any action of the authorities to
put an end to this illicit occupation of the public
domain (law of 1905) and this disorder with the
law and order.
I would think a lot more of you if you could ever bring yourself to look at both sides of these sorts of issues rather than immediately putting forth your standard knee jerk reaction.
The 751 No-Go Zones of France
I addressed the clothing issue (which is the thread topic) while you go off on no-go zones like they have any connection. Telling citizens of your country what clothes they can/can't wear is wrong. Otherwise we'll all end up wearing matching jumpsuits like every sci-fi movie shows
I took a French class this summer and my teacher was a grad student from France. He said the major issue here was that France believes immigrants to its country should strive to integrate themselves into French society. The Muslim practice of women covering their faces in public was isolating them as a foreign cultural group and preventing them from integrating.
Why is it wrong?
They don't have a right to protect their culture?
There are also security issues here, like how it is illegal to have too much tint on the windows of ones car here in the US.
Why do we insist everybody act like us.
I think banning the damn things is way overdue. They are part Western Civilization, it is time they started acting like it.
I addressed the clothing issue (which is the thread topic) while you go off on no-go zones like they have any connection. Telling citizens of your country what clothes they can/can't wear is wrong. Otherwise we'll all end up wearing matching jumpsuits like every sci-fi movie shows
And you didn't answer my question either.
All you did was to express the supposedly altruistic
opinion that French society has no right to protect
itself from these rude intruders and project some
absurd sci-fi future.
they can be free to allow whoever they want into their country, but it is wrong to tell someone how to dress. not in a democracy. the security issues are very overblown. we seem to have little problem in the US with these problems. nor does the UK.
Labidi's experience suggests that in both Tunisia
and France the recent banning of the hijab has
actually helped Muslim women who are subject
to Islamist indoctrination.
For Islamists, the imperative to veil women justifies
almost any means. Sometimes they try to buy off
resistance. Some French Muslim families, for instance,
are paid 500 euros (around $600) per quarter by
extremist Muslim organizations just to have their
daughters wear the hijab.
This has also happened in the United States.
Indeed, the famous and brave Syrian-American
psychiatrist Wafa Sultan recently told the Jerusalem
Post that after she moved to the United States in
1991, Saudis offered her $1,500 a month to cover
her head and attend a mosque.
---------------------------------------
A survey conducted in France in May 2003 found
that 77 percent of girls wearing the hijab said
they did so because of physical threats from
Islamist groups.
----------------------
In light of this, wearing the hijab may or may not
be a manifestation of the free exercise of religion.
For any individual, it may reflect the very opposite
--religious coercion. In fact, millions of women are
forced to wear the veil for fear of physical retribution.
And the fear is well founded.
They are not telling people how to dress, they
are telling people they cannot conceal their
identity in public.
The measure would outlaw face-covering veils in streets, including those worn by tourists from the Middle East and elsewhere. It is aimed at ensuring gender equality, women's dignity and security, as well as upholding France's secular values and its way of life.
" they cannot conceal their identity in public"
do you really think it's oh so hard to conceal ones identity in public? and also do you really think that dressing head to toe in a hijab is a good way to not draw attention to yourself?
and i agree it is a problem that many radical muslims throw insults at islamic women not wearing proper headgear, but that should be dealt with seperately. There are pleny of muslim women that FREELY chose to wear it and they shouldn't have their rights violated.