agVOL90
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2014
- Messages
- 401
- Likes
- 860
A post in the thread below got me thinking about how our political views are SO different amongst each other, I would like to see you rank the Presidents into categories based on your opinions..
Some Factors to consider:
Foreign stances/Wars/Treaties/Impact
Domestic Programs
Abiding by US Constitutional/Law
Inspirational Leadership
Morals/Intellect/Qualities of a GOOD Person/Personal Life
Love of American values
Ability to work with others to get things done
Overall Impact on American History
These do NOT have to be numerically ranked, just put into categories. You can make statements as to why if you choose.
Here are mine just at first glance
Great
George Washington
John Adams
Thomas Jefferson
James Madison
Theodore Roosevelt
Ronald Reagan
Good/Above Average
James Monroe
James Polk
Abraham Lincoln
Dwight Eisenhower
JFK
John Q Adams
Andrew Jackson
William McKinley
William Taft
Woodrow Wilson
Calvin Coolidge
FDR
Harry Truman
Richard Nixon
Average
Martin Van Buren
John Tyler
Millard Fillmore
Franklin Pierce
Rutherford B. Hayes
James Garfield
Chester Arthur
Grover Cleveland
George HW Bush
Bill Clinton
George W. Bush
Barack Obama
Donald Trump
Lyndon Johnson
Below Average/Other
William Henry Harrison
Benjamin Harrison
Zachary Taylor
James Buchanan
Andrew Johnson
Ulysses Grant
Herbert Hoover
Gerald Ford
Jimmy Carter
Joe Biden (TBD)
It's not easy for a sitting president to lose re-election. That makes it hard to sell a one term president as a success... although George H.W. Bush wasn't bad; definitely better than his son. The same can be said for John Adams.Should we just go ahead and classify all 1-term presidents to below average and all 2-term to at least average?
Entering WW1 for the absolute hell of it killing and maiming 120k US troops, accomplishing nothing . Which then paved the way for Hitler and the Nazis is far worse than anything Trump ever did or could dream of doing. Oh and I forgot to include signing the Federal Reserve into being, that will prove to be the end of us when we fully become a VenezuelaI have. Hoover is the worst of the group, no doubt. But none of them sucked nearly as badly as Trump, not even close
-Lincoln the best. Although @volfanhill makes a good point about Harrison.
-The reality TV star was the worst no doubt. Nixon was previously the worst but got a nice bump up a notch after 2016-2020.
Average? I'd put the benchmark at both Bushes, Obama, Fillmore/Polk/Eisenhower. All average and could be slotted in any order near one another
In Lincoln's attempt to save the country... he saved the country.Lincoln had a tendency to ignore the Constitution. I don't think he was a horrible POTUS, but in his attempt to "preserve the Union", he crapped all over the Constitution.
Jackson purposely annihilated the Native Americans. Can't support that.
FDR created the nanny state. Grew the federal government far too much.
It is absurd to speak of "usurping" the Constitution of a nation either on the brink of, or engaged in, a Civil War. That Constitution only still exists today, because that nation was salvaged.His body count and history of usurping the constitution says I’m 100% correct. The ends do not justify the means.
Not really true. There would still be a United States, even if he had let the southern states secede. And honestly, there's a good chance reunification would have eventually happened, peacefully, because we're stronger as a whole.It is absurd to speak of "usurping" the Constitution of a nation either on the brink of, or engaged in, a Civil War. That Constitution only still exists today, because that nation was salvaged.
Maybe toss Bush Junior in there at the bottom otherwise I completely agreeTop tier
Jackson, Washington, Reagan, Jefferson
Terrible
FDR, Hoover, Carter, Wilson, Obama
FDR was a steaming pile of excrement. He set into motion the mechanisms and attitudes that.will ultimately be the downfall of this nation.
We are left to our own conjecture on the matter. You can't say for certain what is or isn't true. I believe that Lincoln handled a crisis before him as well as it could have been done... and with policies that neither Pierce or Buchanan were strong enough to adopt.Not really true. There would still be a united States, even if he had let the southern states secede. And honestly, there's a good chance reunification would have eventually happened, peacefully, because we're stronger as a whole.
None of that changes him crapping all over the Constitution.We are left to our own conjecture on the matter. You can't say for certain what is or isn't true. I believe that Lincoln handled a crisis before him as well as it could have been done... and with policies that neither Pierce or Buchanan were strong enough to adopt.