DD4ME
Zoo Keeper
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2010
- Messages
- 67,266
- Likes
- 182,202
I honestly thought there was a lot of debate about the coaches doing more to help the guy...idk I'm lost now. I think the final answer is whip dey ass though.Wow. I wonder how many more ways posters here will find to blame everything that's wrong with the O on Worley? This one even had the creative twist of taking a shot at Dooley.
To answer the OP. Worley is a work in progress but frankly the coaches did not go to extraordinary lengths to defend or protect him. He did some good things... some very good things. He did some bad things... that have to be cleaned up.
If you were coaching a kid as talented but at the same time as stupid as Bray could be... honesty would almost demand you eventually make comments like that. Bray was not very coachable and reckless. Worley has been nothing but coachable and maybe too careful. I'm not even sure Bray could start or play for Jones... much less avoid criticism.
Wow. I wonder how many more ways posters here will find to blame everything that's wrong with the O on Worley? This one even had the creative twist of taking a shot at Dooley.
To answer the OP. Worley is a work in progress but frankly the coaches did not go to extraordinary lengths to defend or protect him. He did some good things... some very good things. He did some bad things... that have to be cleaned up.
If you were coaching a kid as talented but at the same time as stupid as Bray could be... honesty would almost demand you eventually make comments like that. Bray was not very coachable and reckless. Worley has been nothing but coachable and maybe too careful. I'm not even sure Bray could start or play for Jones... much less avoid criticism.
Who made lemonade?
The staff that made us VT's beeches?
Or the one who couldn't put the right number of players on the field?
I see people trying to discuss or debate what the solutions are and Doyle just wanting to stick a blame badge on one source. We didn't get this deep in a hole through one bad decision, it took a lot.
Fulmer is responsible for driving the car into the ditch. Kiffin is responsible for first making it look as if he might pull it out then letting go and pushing it even deeper. Dooley was unable to do much to pull it out but left the situation a little better than he found it. Jones is now working his tail off trying to get it out as fast as he can.
The ultimate responsibility is Fulmer's. But the current situation is the product of decisions made since he left... none of which have fixed the problem.
Forgive me, oh wise one, for placing the weight of the blame of our current situation at the feet of the staff that were in charge the previous three years.
I see this argument alot on here and it seems odd to me. If we don't have the personnel to run the system, then does running it now necessarily benefit us in the future?
Does it help us, in the future, for our offense to look inept now? Does that help keep fans on board? Does it help us get the recruits we need for the future?
If we're just focused on building for the future, then why are the young quarterbacks not getting any playing time? Does anyone really think Worley is a long-term answer at QB in this system? Would it help with recruiting wide receivers for them to maybe have some confidence that we'll have a QB who can get them the ball?
Also, doesn't this all sound eerily like what was said to excuse the defense Sal Sunseri was running? Didn't loads of posters come on here and say that the 3-4 was usually bad in the first year, but greatly improved in the 2nd and we would see an improvement in the future once we had the right personnel?
Fulmer is responsible for driving the car into the ditch. Kiffin is responsible for first making it look as if he might pull it out then letting go and pushing it even deeper. Dooley was unable to do much to pull it out but left the situation a little better than he found it. Jones is now working his tail off trying to get it out as fast as he can.
The ultimate responsibility is Fulmer's. But the current situation is the product of decisions made since he left... none of which have fixed the problem.
Which coaching staff do you pin it on?
You could make the argument with the talent we have we will look inept no matter what system we run. But at last with this system it benefits the young guys playing. We are playing a ton of freshmen!
Wow, bad example with Sal Sunseri. Thats actually a prime example as to why you would want to implement a system early. Dooley's problem was that he tried to implement a 3-4 defensive system in the crucial 3rd year. Meaning he waited too late to implement a system. So what do you suggest Butch do? Run a system now, then change it next year or then next year? Then our young WRs have too learn a whole new system again?
Also it seems that the young QBs are not ready. This I do not know for sure, but if one of them was ready to play Butch would have them out there. He's already playing a ton of freshmen. Worley is probably the best option right now. Even though we are working for the future, you still have to try and win today. Thats why we still put the best players on the field.
Also the recruits that you go after fit the system you are running. I don't think it benefits you to run a pro-style offense and try and recruit a spread QB. You can show the recruits what kind of offense you want to have and tell them that they will be the key to making it work.