Is he not on X? I don't social media other than VN.
I meant drop by my house.
It's not exactly "bias," more like
manipulation. What happens, apparently, is a large organized group or more likely someone with a BOT reports the tweet enough times that some automatic function replaces the image with a warning. This greatly reduces what the ad people call "impressions" and almost certainly greatly lowers the number of clicks the tweet gets (the number of readers). This kind of op debuted in cases involving political tweets iirc, but seems to have been adopted for use in college football. It happens pretty often to tweets by recruits who include our power T, uniforms, or other images. It typically happens in cases where the competition for the recruit is high.
For the tweet I used as an example (pretty much at random), the image was visible for an hour or two, as many here would have seen, then it was covered by the
inapplicable "sensitive" warning. The image is not sensitive. That is clear. It is still accessible if you click the warning in the right place. But if one is unfamiliar with this op, one might rightly expect something one doesn't wish and pass it by. Or, one is just never by "grabbed" by the visual, since it was covered, and passes the tweet by, unmotivated.
Apparently, someone wants to hide (as best as they can): the video evidence of KY's behavior at our tunnel before the game; or the lack of official concern about or intervention in a situation that endangered player safety; or the lack of repercussions for KY's behavior (technically a penalty); or possibly the fact that the intimidation tactic ended up as a humiliating sad-sack failure for KY.