drvenner
Winning is fun
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 43,925
- Likes
- 183,611
Yeah, there's no way any body scores 50+ on a Saban-led defense.But those teams you mentioned were much more talented than Vandy. And Pavia is not in any of those QBs leagues when it comes to talent. Vandy would hang around a little but a Saban led Bama this year beats them by 17+. Also they wouldn’t have scored 40 on Bama either.
"I think it was Alabama because, listen, Alabama trumps Tennessee in a game of meaningful poker. Tennessee did not start the season inside the playoff bubble. Alabama did. Tennessee has looked good and bad, and everything else. For Tennessee, the game was absolutely critical. That goes without saying. I'll leave it to the playoff gurus, but Alabama has a better chance to get back with a loss than Tennessee. Tennessee has Georgia left, and really, that's about it."
-Paul Finebaum
Not saying you're wrong, I just don't window lick for the other teams in this conference..While this is true, I know they don't want none of that SEC smoke. They would not have had a significantly better record than we did since 2009 if they had played our schedule. Prove me wrong.
If you care about Tennessee, you care about our SoS. This isn't complicated.Not saying you're wrong, I just don't window lick for the other teams in this conference..
Tennessee should be the only SEC team anyone on this board should care about.