Recruiting Football Talk VIII

Scoring defense: 2024 Vols #7
Army #5, Indiana #6

Total Defense : Indiana #2, Northern Illinois #4, Minnesota #5, UT #6

There you Proof, by your way,
Of ,
You decide:
1: Indiana, Northern Illinois, Minnesota, Army. Had better players
2: had a better DC

Which is it ? Got to be one right?
Because that #6 UT ranking is proof positive!!!

You love to throw that #6 around so what BS You got to say it means something for Ut but the others, nah!
I’ll wait 😂😂😂😂😂
I can't believe that in 2025 we're still using freaking total scoring and total defense to measure defenses in an era where pace and strength-of-schedule matter more than they ever have.

EPA / Play (SOS- + Pace-Adjusted)
1. Ohio State
2. Notre Dame
3. Tennessee (#1 against rush, #5 against the
4. Texas
5. Alabama
6. Oregon

ESPN Def. Efficiency
1. Notre Dame
2. Texas
3. Ohio State
4. Tennessee
5. Mississippi
6. Penn State

This was an elite defense on the likes of teams that had far superior talent (Ohio State, Alabama, Oregon, Texas, etc.) and the best we've had in a long, long time. We had some clear weaknesses that got exposed late (slow LB and S that struggled laterally in pass coverage), but that Banks put these numbers together with a flawed unit was an absolutely masterclass. So glad he's coming back.
 
I can't believe that in 2025 we're still using freaking total scoring and total defense to measure defenses in an era where pace and strength-of-schedule matter more than they ever have.

EPA / Play (SOS- + Pace-Adjusted)
1. Ohio State
2. Notre Dame
3. Tennessee (#1 against rush, #5 against the
4. Texas
5. Alabama
6. Oregon

ESPN Def. Efficiency
1. Notre Dame
2. Texas
3. Ohio State
4. Tennessee
5. Mississippi
6. Penn State

This was an elite defense on the likes of teams that had far superior talent (Ohio State, Alabama, Oregon, Texas, etc.) and the best we've had in a long, long time. We had some clear weaknesses that got exposed late (slow LB and S that struggled laterally in pass coverage), but that Banks put these numbers together with a flawed unit was an absolutely masterclass. So glad he's coming back.
By looking at #1/2 and #1/3, did the committee get it right?
 
So 4 DCs in the country are better than him? That’s pretty good he’s the 5th best DC!! You even had to dip into G5 to find a couple of them.

Fun fact: did you know that ARK finished ranked higher (10th in the country) in Total Offense than any team that IU, Northern Illinois, or Minnesota played?
That’s what you get from this.
Not surprising.
You would think so , I mean rankings and stats. Proves everything right? Or is they only matter if it fits your narrative? Yeah that’s its
 
I can't believe that in 2025 we're still using freaking total scoring and total defense to measure defenses in an era where pace and strength-of-schedule matter more than they ever have.

EPA / Play (SOS- + Pace-Adjusted)
1. Ohio State
2. Notre Dame
3. Tennessee (#1 against rush, #5 against the
4. Texas
5. Alabama
6. Oregon

ESPN Def. Efficiency
1. Notre Dame
2. Texas
3. Ohio State
4. Tennessee
5. Mississippi
6. Penn State

This was an elite defense on the likes of teams that had far superior talent (Ohio State, Alabama, Oregon, Texas, etc.) and the best we've had in a long, long time. We had some clear weaknesses that got exposed late (slow LB and S that struggled laterally in pass coverage), but that Banks put these numbers together with a flawed unit was an absolutely masterclass. So glad he's coming back.
Stop the flawed unit BS.
We were good. Every team has some weaknesses like us.
Master class. Nah , he did a good job with what he had most of the time.
 
just making an example that posting random sh*+ doesn’t prove or disprove anything!!!

Yall believe he’s the reason we’re 10 -2 , it’s your opinion, you got a right to believe what you want!

I believe any number of DC’s at power 5 conference teams would of done just as well and some better.

Also some not as good.
Bruin, is that you?
 

VN Store



Back
Top