jave36
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2011
- Messages
- 25,199
- Likes
- 27,765
The full time argument is truly one of the dumbest. Public accountability and better technology are the two primary ways officiating could improve, especially in football.I've read it before because I remember laughing thinking "I'm sure the million dollar coach that's going to be on the hot seat now is really enjoying the added "character to the game caused by that missed call"
But, more broadly, there is a lot of resistance to other, non-human, solutions. Many think you simply need to throw more money and more hours at college refs and they'll suddenly become...what? awful NFL refs??
The whole notion that any human being has the sensory ability to accurately referree high-level sporting events is complete myth. At least not anywhere near the level that will be considered acceptable by coaches, players, fans. And now we finally have an "out"...and some still resort to "jUsT MakE ThE ReFs FuLL-tImE".
I do think there's a grain of truth that some penalties will always need a human judgment call, but spotting the ball is not one of those. Same with false start/offside, should never be left to judgment who went first.