Been thinking about a interview I heard on a Knoxville radio station a couple weeks ago and wondering what the opinions of this theory would be on here. Before I go on please understand I didn't grow up a Vol fan. So while I continue to learn the history of the program realize I don't have the same perspective as some as I didn't move to TN until 2006. Started rooting for the Vols in 2010ish and a season ticket holder in 2015. So I missed the glory years and would really like to get back to that so I can experience it first hand.
I won't say the station or the person making these comments at first because I already know most would tune it out just based on that haha. But the interviewee brought up an explanation of our current status in the CFB landscape. On the surface it makes sense. But didn't know if he was just hating on UT. He said one big reason we are struggling is because of how CFB has exploded over the last 20 years and tv deals probably hurt teams like us and Nebraska the most. Mainly because almost every game is on TV or a streaming service and everyone has weekly access to almost every team now. Where as in the 80s and 90s we were regularly featured on a national broadcast and kids from all over the south followed us. Many of them came to UT so they could play on a big stage in front of a national audience on TV. Which is why CPF could go into South Carolina (and other surrounding states) and recruit big name players to come to UT. He continued by saying our expectations as fans haven't caught up with the effect TV has had on our program. Also mentioned its hard on us because Tennessee isn't really a power state in terms of high school talent on a national scale.
On the surface it makes sense. I just wondered what the opinion was on this from some of you seasoned UT vets. For the record I don't like this guy as he is a big UT hater. Just found this outlook interesting.
There's something to that in merit.. But... With cable TV and ESPN coming in main stream in the 90s, and the CBS deal... TV wasn't THE same draw it was in the 80s.
That said it's definitely not a factor now.
I think what had more impact than anything was just how much money was available for distribution among all conference members.
The gap TN had on the bottom 3/4 off the sec in terms of revenues was rather large and that helped TN pay for facilities, coaches, recruiting budgets among other things... Programs like UK, USCe, vandy etc.. Really couldn't compete.
Now everyone has great facilities and coaches all make millions.. So that gap is closed and recruits can get virtually the same experience at those other programs....
The landscape is different.. Not just at places like TN.. But also at those programs that we used to consider "less than"...
Sustainability today is much harder in the sec... But one thing has been proven.. If you get the machine rolling, like at bama, it can keep rolling... They have a very reliable product... Even programs like uf, UGA, Auburn, LSU.. Who have all had great success the last 20 years, have not been able to sustain at that level...
UGA has a shot at it but at some point they're going to have to Prove their product is as reliable as bama's... Or it won't sustain either. At least not like bama.
We have no real choice but to play the long game. There is no quick fix for us right now.
Point being.. When many other factors are relatively the same... The differences for recruiting come down to "state of the program" type issues.. Who's winning at a high level? Path to the NFL? Culture? Coaching? Etc...