I'm on all of these except for the Gallman/Evans bet. Lettuce make some cheese tonight my friend.Tonight they have, 1+ TD scored in the first quarter at +100
A same game parlay where they refund your money up to $10 if you lose
Wayne Gallman or Mike Evans first to score +500
Gronk scores and Tampa wins +330
It depends. Fighting ethics is a spectrum. At one end is fighting for sport, in which you fight clean, and at the other end is fighting for your life, in which all tactics are allowable: gouging, poking, weapons of convenience, whatever it takes to survive.I fight dirty, but not taint poking dirty. That's on a whole other level.
Edited...nobody needed to know that..it was another life.It depends. Fighting ethics is a spectrum. At one end is fighting for sport, in which you fight clean, and at the other end is fighting for your life, in which all tactics are allowable: gouging, poking, weapons of convenience, whatever it takes to survive.
But in between is that big gray area of fighting for principle, where there's a sliding scale of acceptable dirtiness. For instance, eye gouging is allowable if you fight a man for saying your wife is a tramp; taint poking is warranted if he found out for sure.
If taint poking is your thing, I won't judge, but I also don't want to fight you.It depends. Fighting ethics is a spectrum. At one end is fighting for sport, in which you fight clean, and at the other end is fighting for your life, in which all tactics are allowable: gouging, poking, weapons of convenience, whatever it takes to survive.
But in between is that big gray area of fighting for principle, where there's a sliding scale of acceptable dirtiness. For instance, eye gouging is allowable if you fight a man for saying your wife is a tramp; taint poking is warranted if he found out for sure.