Recruiting Forum Football Talk II

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm having mine out next Tuesday and I was curious about it since you sound like everything is going well. I'm a bit younger than you (50) so, hopefully, a long way to go yet and getting rid of the cancer now rather than waiting seemed to be the best option. The surgeon I'm seeing specializes in robotic surgery so I'm praying for good results.

How are you doing with your surgery and recovery? If you posted already, I missed it.
 
Some folks in the analytics community have attempted to nail down certain factors that commonly result in optimized college offenses from a schematic standpoint. The one list I've seen is:

1) Space
2) Pace
3) Optionality - RPOs, zone-reads, etc
4) Simplicity
5) QB as a run threat

Curious how you all would grade our current scheme on these factors. I still think Chaney is wanting an offense that has 4 of these. Imo the only one he may be resistant to is simplicity. Unfortunately rn we feel capped at 2 of them (space, pace). HB may give us a 3rd in optionality (maybe he can run RPOs?). If we could add a run threat at QB and simplify things, we'd essentially be running a Clemson/OSU style. Briles/Lebby is similar in 4 factors, though don't usually push the QB run threat as much and can be more run heavy, but arguably have more optionality, pace, and space. If we have more of a pro style QB this would still be a very optimized route to go.
On the letter scale, (ABCDF) I'd give us somewhere around XYZ.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top