Curious as to your thoughts on the portal and how it impacts HS classes going forward? In listening to Brock Huard and EJ Manuel on their afternoon show on ESPNU radio yesterday, they and their guests were discussing that leaving numerous spots for transfers will be the 'norm' going forward. And while I agree that historically the 4 year HS player model is how teams have been built, one could argue the failure rate of HS vs. Transfer player is similar.
Another point to take into consideration is that, up until recent history, kids going the transfer route were largely under performing, or disciplinary risks, which were why they were there to begin with. In today's landscape we're seeing more and more kids that are there for reasons like being buried on an extremely deep depth chart or having the opportunity to change their minds because of a coaching change, or just because. To me, the stigma of the transfer player has all but evaporated. I tend to think the days of filling a class with 25 HS kids is gone.
I’m usually on board with no transfers, but Mullen has proven me wrong as much as I’d hate to say it. Some of those guys may not be NFL guys, but they do help that team win.
Curious as to your thoughts on the portal and how it impacts HS classes going forward? In listening to Brock Huard and EJ Manuel on their afternoon show on ESPNU radio yesterday, they and their guests were discussing that leaving numerous spots for transfers will be the 'norm' going forward. And while I agree that historically the 4 year HS player model is how teams have been built, one could argue the failure rate of HS vs. Transfer player is similar.
Another point to take into consideration is that, up until recent history, kids going the transfer route were largely under performing, or disciplinary risks, which were why they were there to begin with. In today's landscape we're seeing more and more kids that are there for reasons like being buried on an extremely deep depth chart or having the opportunity to change their minds because of a coaching change, or just because. To me, the stigma of the transfer player has all but evaporated. I tend to think the days of filling a class with 25 HS kids is gone.
Curious as to your thoughts on the portal and how it impacts HS classes going forward? In listening to Brock Huard and EJ Manuel on their afternoon show on ESPNU radio yesterday, they and their guests were discussing that leaving numerous spots for transfers will be the 'norm' going forward. And while I agree that historically the 4 year HS player model is how teams have been built, one could argue the failure rate of HS vs. Transfer player is similar.
Another point to take into consideration is that, up until recent history, kids going the transfer route were largely under performing, or disciplinary risks, which were why they were there to begin with. In today's landscape we're seeing more and more kids that are there for reasons like being buried on an extremely deep depth chart or having the opportunity to change their minds because of a coaching change, or just because. To me, the stigma of the transfer player has all but evaporated. I tend to think the days of filling a class with 25 HS kids is gone.
100%.
To sign nothing but or say, over 90% HS players is naive. Programs lose a bunch over the course of 3-4 years without the rule change. That just accelerated, probably increased the rate 50% IMO. CFB's version of limited free agency.
Some interesting stuff in there. Notably that they expect at least a one year bowl ban and that Pruitt is still trying recoup more than 12 million. Was hoping to avoid the bowl ban somehow.
Partially... most people my age and a bit younger are raging SJWs on social media. Not I good Sir.