Recruiting Forum Football Talk IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
It could get real ugly for a while. They are going to pick a few schools to go after and those schools will have to decide whether to take it or try to drop out of the NCAA and get others to break away. May be messy. Hope we aren’t the target but the Nico deal worries me.

The Nico deal is all assumptions. We don’t know it happened. And even if it did, it would have been completely legal when it did. Nothing the NCAA can do about it.
 
And besides, the real problem is schools pulling BS like USC did with the Pitt WR. They used NIL to get him to transfer. That should be tampering, and it should be illegal. We'll see what comes of it. But I don't see any way the NCAA could legitimately target us as everything Spyre did was legal. Rules have changed. There was an NCAA rule that players couldn't be paid. Yet now they can. They can't punish a school and not expect a lawsuit, and the law is on the side of the schools. NCAA cannot win this.

Agreed. The NCAA legal team has to know it’s essentially an unwinnable case. So that begs the question, why still try and go through with something you know you have no shot at?
 
It could get real ugly for a while. They are going to pick a few schools to go after and those schools will have to decide whether to take it or try to drop out of the NCAA and get others to break away. May be messy. Hope we aren’t the target but the Nico deal worries me.
Nico owns NIL value wherever he goes. The market has been opened. NCAA sanctions at this point would be libelous.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top