Adam2014
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2011
- Messages
- 2,739
- Likes
- 17,158
The thing we all need to try and understand is this system has to have a certain type OL. The big boys' coming in no matter how they are rated will have a tough time playing any real time. They have got to be in basketball shape and few OL I have ever seen are in that type of shape plus they have got to be fast and quick or they wouldn't help anyway. A certain type of linemen is what they want and they are looking for those not just a person that can block but one that can sprint, block repeat.....a lot.If recruiting doesn’t pick up for offensive linemen, it won’t matter who the running backs are! According to this, evaluation and getting guys on board appear to be a big problem for OL. This needs to change ASAP for stability and success in 2-4 years! It must be a high priority!
The Tony Basilio Show
Missed out on the top Tennessee linemen. That's not a good report for the '23 recruits. 3 Tennessee 4* linemen going to SEC opponents Ark, Miss, Miss. State.
Tennessee only wanted Brycen Sanders from that list….. we also have two other players signed from the state that may play offensive line as well…. We will be fine…. No reason to worry yet.
I’m more interested in our % of nailing our evaluations…. We signed four lineman last year…. 3 of them not highly rated…. If they become productive lineman than we won’t have to worry about lineman recruiting… Pruitt seemed to close late really well but the overwhelming majority of those guys were busts.would be interrsting to see our closing % over last say, 5 years.
I agree with that…. I don’t care who we miss on though…. I worry about who we get.I could care less about in state players…that is probably the most overhyped stat…most make their name on playing inferior competition. All that being said no way of denying Ellarbee missed on Francis, Simmons and Ramil…Sanders too.
Yes and that’s four players for a unit we desperately need much better depth and some people around here understand it takes linemen the longest time to develop!I could care less about in state players…that is probably the most overhyped stat…most make their name on playing inferior competition. All that being said no way of denying Ellarbee missed on Francis, Simmons and Ramil…Sanders too.
Is anyone else surprised that Dylan Sampson has seemingly moved ahead of JWT on the depth chart already?
oh. i dont care either, just saying I wager even when we were illegally paying players with greasy cash from $1 menu, our closing rate was near or about the same, maybe worse.I’m more interested in our % of nailing our evaluations…. We signed four lineman last year…. 3 of them not highly rated…. If they become productive lineman than we won’t have to worry about lineman recruiting… Pruitt seemed to close late really well but the overwhelming majority of those guys were busts.
i think it's waaaay too early to even have the ability to pass judgement on OL brought in last year as tr fr. which almost certainly means is waaaaaay too early to pass judgment on prospects that have yet to sign here, much less take a snap.If recruiting doesn’t pick up for offensive linemen, it won’t matter who the running backs are! According to this, evaluation and getting guys on board appear to be a big problem for OL. This needs to change ASAP for stability and success in 2-4 years! It must be a high priority!
The Tony Basilio Show
@InVOLuntary what did Social Security Income look like then?Damn, older folks had it rough back in the day. Makes me feel not so bad about them having to walk 50 miles barefoot in the snow uphill to go to schoolView attachment 478518