Tried really hard to just let this go. Yes, we need to wait before forming an opinion on this situation. And our opinion really means nothing. And didn’t want to get personal, but you keep bringing up orange glasses or underwear as if any argument that is in favor of someone who unlawfully enters a house is the victim when bad things happen to him. And, yes, I realize the law would be on his side if he did nothing threatening outside of the apartment (because he was just drunk after all). But…
Just a few months ago my son took something and got it in his head that his wife was at a neighbor’s house. He went and looked in the window to see if she was there. The woman called the police who arrested him. My opinion was the same. “You are lucky you did not get shot!” He agreed. Thank God she called, and he was arrested. Woke him up, and he went to rehab. And he was lucky some man didn’t chase him down the street and beat his teeth out. Disagree that’s reprehensible. And has absolutely nothing to do with my favorite football player. The moral compass should be to stop making the criminals the victim.
OK. Then let's stop making criminals the victim.
If things went down as stated,
and the drunk kid was followed outside and assaulted, then the UT football player is a criminal and should be charged.
I'm not sure of the criminal intent of opening a door that you think is the apartment that you just left, apologizing, and leaving. (Remember, we're arguing the assumption that the statement as reported is true.)
My son and daughter-in-law moved into an apartment complex last year. Soon after they moved in, my wife and I went to visit and knocked on the wrong door. Repeatedly. Until a scared couple of older ladies cracked the door behind a chain and asked if they could help us. I apologized profusely. They laughed and said, "You want the white kids upstairs. Seem like nice kids." I said they are and asked them to keep an eye on them for us.
Similar mistake. No harm. No foul.
I'm not sure I'd equate a drunk kid going into the wrong apartment, apologizing and leaving as "making a criminal the victim".
It's a similar mistake as is made all the time in apartment complexes. It's not breaking and entering. And it's not a peeping Tom.
It's a stupid kid.
So,
if he's leaving and a UT football player actually did follow him to the landing and punch him down the stairs, committing felonious bodily injury--no matter if the drunk kid inferred he was being a dick--then it's much more of a criminal behavior than being drunk and bad with directions.