Recruiting Forum Football Talk V

Status
Not open for further replies.
#79,057
#79,057
cHiZzLeVOL said:
Miltons going to win the Heisman next year. Book that.
Click to expand...
If he performs 80% of the way he has this year next year you are looking at a sure fire top 3 draft pick. Look how much they are drooling over Richardson and as a thrower he is a high 50% passer. I fully expect Bazooka Joe to fulfill expectations
 
  • Like
Reactions: MockingVol, VOLSONLY, TN-POSSUM and 7 others
#79,059
#79,059
fearsvols said:
If he performs 80% of the way he has this year next year you are looking at a sure fire top 3 draft pick. Look how much they are drooling over Richardson and as a thrower he is a high 50% passer. I fully expect Bazooka Joe to fulfill expectations
Click to expand...
With the receivers we have it’s going to be a field day. I mean there is literally no one that can cover Squirrel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: smokeyhuntsgators, volinokc and SweetasSoda
#79,061
#79,061
Heisman Competition:

Player A: 67.1%, 2750 yds, 9.9 yds/att, 34 TDs, 4 INTs; 83 rush yds, 2.9 yds/rush att, 0 rush TDs
Player B: 71.1%, 2888 yds, 10.1 yds/att, 24 TDs, 2 INTs; 405 rush yds, 4.1 yds/rush att, 5 rush TDs

The ONLY thing player A has over player B is that he's responsible for 5 more TDs. Backup QBs are responsible for 6 TDs for player B's team vs 1 for player A's team. That shows player B could have the same number of TDs if he played more garbage time. Note: Player B's competition > Player A's.

Who deserves the Heisman?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SmokinBob, hooter vol, VOLSONLY and 10 others
#79,063
#79,063
Teams with commits in the All-American Bowl/UA Games so far. (Out of order alphabetically. I was going thru it fast. Also, not all teams are on here)

Alabama - 13
ND - 13
Florida - 11
UGA - 11
OSU - 9
Miami - 9
Clemson - 7
Oregon - 7
LSU - 6
Vols - 6 (Nico isn't on the rosters but he might as well be one)
FSU - 4
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ionaVOL, MrVolton, VOLSONLY and 9 others
#79,064
#79,064
TCU and Michigan could both possibly lose this week. They have hard games. USC is also probably going to lose to UCLA…..

Pretty sure that would put us back into playoff contention. On top of that Michigan still has to play Ohio State…..
 
  • Like
Reactions: SweetasSoda
#79,065
#79,065
cHiZzLeVOL said:
TCU and Michigan could both possibly lose this week. They have hard games. USC is also probably going to lose to UCLA…..

Pretty sure that would put us back into playoff contention. On top of that Michigan still has to play Ohio State…..
Click to expand...
I’m pretty sure we are in contention now and that would 100% lock 🔒 us in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brillovol, Smyrna ATL Vol, VOLSONLY and 9 others
#79,066
#79,066
cHiZzLeVOL said:
TCU and Michigan could both possibly lose this week. They have hard games. USC is also probably going to lose to UCLA…..

Pretty sure that would put us back into playoff contention. On top of that Michigan still has to play Ohio State…..
Click to expand...
That would lock us in at #3
 
#79,067
#79,067
mykidturnedmeintoaVOL said:
As a Baylor alum, I can only say that it depends on which Baylor team shows up. Based on some of games they played this year, I say yes they will beat TCU. But if the team that played KState shows up…no way.

We do hate TCU passionately and we’re playing them at home...so I’m hoping my Bears show up on Saturday and help my VOLS jump into the playoffs! Sic ‘Em Bears and Go Vols!!!
Click to expand...
Da Bears!
 
  • Like
Reactions: VOLSONLY, Big Orange#1, Paper_Towel and 3 others
#79,068
#79,068
volbeast33 said:


I do agree with this…. Screw SEC pride.
Click to expand...

I have never cheered for an SEC team to win anything. It’s my Vols or nothing. I’ve always wondered why my fellow Vol fans cheer for SEC teams in bowl games. I know you say “It makes our conference look strong” I could care less what our conference looks like. I just can’t process in my mind any circumstances to ever cheer for Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and all the others…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ridgerunner Vol, Jack Burton, DeusExMachina and 11 others
#79,070
#79,070
Kristy* said:
Heisman Competition:

Player A: 67.1%, 2750 yds, 9.9 yds/att, 34 TDs, 4 INTs; 83 rush yds, 2.9 yds/rush att, 0 rush TDs
Player B: 71.1%, 2888 yds, 10.1 yds/att, 24 TDs, 2 INTs; 405 rush yds, 4.1 yds/rush att, 5 rush TDs

The ONLY thing player A has over player B is that he's responsible for 5 more TDs. Backup QBs are responsible for 6 TDs for player B's team vs 1 for player A's team. That shows player B could have the same number of TDs if he played more garbage time. Note: Player B's competition > Player A's.

Who deserves the Heisman?
Click to expand...
Player C.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gus D's kernbred and Ulysees E. McGill
#79,072
#79,072
Kristy* said:
Heisman Competition:

Player A: 67.1%, 2750 yds, 9.9 yds/att, 34 TDs, 4 INTs; 83 rush yds, 2.9 yds/rush att, 0 rush TDs
Player B: 71.1%, 2888 yds, 10.1 yds/att, 24 TDs, 2 INTs; 405 rush yds, 4.1 yds/rush att, 5 rush TDs

The ONLY thing player A has over player B is that he's responsible for 5 more TDs. Backup QBs are responsible for 6 TDs for player B's team vs 1 for player A's team. That shows player B could have the same number of TDs if he played more garbage time. Note: Player B's competition > Player A's.

Who deserves the Heisman?
Click to expand...
The Big 10 special teams gunner that has no stats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: beneVOLence, Gus D's kernbred and SweetasSoda
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top