Thanks.
Though it's "not just to argue". Just comfortable with having respectful dialogue (well, mostly
) so it's a natural part of conversations. "Argue" sounds like 2 people yelling at each other emotionally - negative connotations and all, rather than simply discussing, like Gee and I were doing comfortably.
I definitely will narrow things down to very particular premises to try and get them straight or further discuss them, whether or not I even agree with the overall conclusion. Many times I don't, but I'd rather be part of a genuine discussion than some disingenuous debate. Even sides I agree or disagree with in nature, I'd rather not let a false premise go unnoticed. It's the partisan folks that hate it. They'll think I'm over on one side one minute and the opposite the next, when really I'm just trying to help everyone involved tease out and clarify the bases of the debate
Better to have genuine discussions in society, otherwise everyone is so fragile and explosive when they do discuss things. As we see these days. Folks can hardly talk to one another on many topics without it going south. Being nuanced is seen as being combative. As if discussions or respectful debates should be taboo. It's not healthy.
And if you disagree, I'll wafflestomp you at the nearest waffle house!