Recruiting Forum Football Talk VI

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you have zero evidence for severe accusations, you should be fired. If you have lots of evidence, you should provide it when making those accusations.
They cover up paying players, they cover up and sweep under the rug all of the speeding problems, I’m sure there are plenty of other things they are covering up.
 
If you have zero evidence for severe accusations, you should be fired. If you have lots of evidence, you should provide it when making those accusations.
Wapo, nyt, nyp all green light worse things daily. I also wouldn't say there's "zero evidence"

He didn't independently verify that 11 guys stayed on the team after accusations. It could be 9 or 2 or 14 but the issue remains.
 
How is it "reasonable"? If they don't find one then they'll have to use the portal. It will only be "reasonable" if they don't have guys to fill those spots 3 years from now.

Recruiting HS kids isn't as important as it once was. In fact, an argument could be made that recruiting OLs out of the portal is necessary to have a good OL in the future. Sort of like a professional team that develops its own guys but then gets free agents to go from good to great.
It’s reasonable because we need to be far better than we have been
 
I don't know if it's true, but I've been told that UGA is the journalist school in the state and the AJC writers are pretty much all UGA grads. But this writer is from out of state. If true, I'm shocked the AJC allowed the original piece to be printed, and I'm not at all surprised the writer was fired.

The KNS probably gives bonuses to reporters who dig up dirt on UT.
 
It’s reasonable because we need to be far better than we have been

Asking, not arguing -

Wouldn’t it be more reasonable to measure success on the field and not by how many guys we land who haven’t played a single down of cfb?

We’ve have had a single good season in 15 years. I’m honestly amazed we get any elite recruits.
 
Wapo, nyt, nyp all green light worse things daily. I also wouldn't say there's "zero evidence"

He didn't independently verify that 11 guys stayed on the team after accusations. It could be 9 or 2 or 14 but the issue remains.
Being lax in your thoroughness and due diligence in one area calls into question your entire credibility. That's pretty fundamental journalism.

And no, those publications do not routinely accuse organizations of covering up a dozen instances of sexual assault with little to no supporting evidence.
 
Being lax in your thoroughness and due diligence in one area calls into question your entire credibility. That's pretty fundamental journalism.

And no, those publications do not routinely accuse organizations of covering up a dozen instances of sexual assault with little to no supporting evidence.
They make accusations with little to no supporting evidence. CNN, MSNBC, Fox news, etc. Fundamental journalism is brought out for convenience these days.
 
a94.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top