ob79
Ashlee's Dad
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2008
- Messages
- 10,152
- Likes
- 16,493
Is 3 top 10 money?
If so, that's too much for him.
I think the sticking point is, and will always be, the salary being commensurate to the HC of the football program--no matter who it is. The fact is, UT will never pay more for the BB HC than it will the FB HC, ever.
Right or wrong, that's a fact.
Personally, I think it's wrong. If you have the right coach--one that you think can bring Final Fours, Elite 8's, etc. to the program with consistency--you pay that price, regardless if [fill in the blank] makes more money.
The most frustrating part about the 50 coaching searches we've had to endure of the last decade (over all our programs) is that our mentally challenged administration and AD puts a greater emphasis on finding a coach within a salary range, rather than who will yield the greatest return on our investment--regardless of the salary.
Does that mean we should pay top dollar everytime? No. Hell no. I'm a big fan of getting a good deal but sometimes a good deal is the one for which you pay a little extra to get a little more in return.
I'm not going to pretend to be a soothsayer or fortune teller but a Gregg Marshall at UT has, IMO, an immediate effect--with recruits, with the media, with publicity, et al. That's free publicity, by the way--and an immediate return on our investment.
Another thing...Hart lucked into Butch Jones, after being publicly shamed by the head coach at a vastly inferior school.
Louisiana Tech makes Louisville look like the New York Yankees. We cannot be publicly turned down by their HC. Privately, yes. Publicly, no.
I am not a fan of Dave Hart's coaching searches thus far. Backing into a potential home run hire is akin to UT's backing into the SECCG in '07.