Recruiting Forum Football Talk XXXIV

Status
Not open for further replies.
#2,827
#2,827
roosterjbh said:
Sitting in the lobby for a big job interview in 20 minutes, and instead of looking at notes I'm reading the report on the new DB recruit.

Ain't that the ******* way
Click to expand...

I remember having an exam in a half hour and instead of studying I was panicking that Danny OBrien's announcement was delayed by like 10 minutes. It's the volunteer way
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,829
#2,829
scvolfan7 said:
From what I've seen of the team that sums it up. I haven't mentioned the Oline because I think they'll be OK and get better as the season goes on. Also I agree! Very glad we have them at home. Need to get revenge not just against them but against muschamp for his comments after that 2014 game
Click to expand...

South Carolina is Ole Miss with less talent. That's the way I would sum up their team.
 
#2,830
#2,830
omghulkhands said:
I wouldn't have believed it if I didn't just look it up.

In Josh Dobbs' senior season, he averaged more total yards per game and touchdowns per game than Tim Tebow did in either his Junior or Senior Season seasons.
Click to expand...

We didn't lose because of offense. The defense and injuries were the main hurdles
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,831
#2,831
Outofmyvolcanmind said:
South Carolina is Ole Miss with less talent. That's the way I would sum up their team.
Click to expand...
That's a pretty accurate description. great offense not looking great on defense. As much as I dislike muschamp though he's a very good defensive coach and he has some pieces to work with (Moore, Williams, Nixon, King). All comes down to what their lines of scrimmage are like.
 
#2,837
#2,837
SergeantVol said:
They'll be ready for their NTC rotation coming up. I was paired up with the Regimental Support Squadron. I covered down on their S2 and S3 sections. Gave them some classes in TACSOP writing, battle drill development, and contingency planning for when SHTF. They were solid and I wanted to push them over the top. I used to do a lot of guest OC/T rotations at NTC so I hit the areas with them that they would get surprised with. Told them that I can't let the Volunteer Regiment fail.
Click to expand...

Nice. My pal is an E6 and I think he leads a gun crew. Very squared away dude.
 
#2,838
#2,838
VolGee4 said:
That probably should be broken down to pre-Bentley and post-Bentley. The offense played better after Bentley started. They only really struggled against UF and Clemson late in the year.
Click to expand...

So basically they struggled against every defense with a pulse. They only scored 24 on us and we weren't very good on D.
 
#2,840
#2,840
scvolfan7 said:
That's a pretty accurate description. great offense not looking great on defense. As much as I dislike muschamp though he's a very good defensive coach and he has some pieces to work with (Moore, Williams, Nixon, King). All comes down to what their lines of scrimmage are like.
Click to expand...

They both have good QB's but Mississippi's is elite. Ole Miss has better skill position players and OL. South Carolina has good WR's.

Ole miss has more talen on D but SCAR has better system and coach.
 
#2,841
#2,841
Outofmyvolcanmind said:
They both have good QB's but Mississippi's is elite. Ole Miss has better skill position players and OL. South Carolina has good WR's.

Ole miss has more talen on D but SCAR has better system and coach.
Click to expand...

Right I was agreeing with you. SC has a great RB core though to go with those receivers. Rico Dowdle is a kid we are going to regret not offering when we had the chance. Ty'son Williams looks like their AK, and turner is a good third back. Mom Denson will get carries too. Bentley just has to be a game manager and I've heard good things about him. He's a coach's son so they spend a lot of time watching film and understanding the game. Only thing I'm saying at the end of the day is that Vegas is wrong. USCe will win more than 5 football games and compete for the east with UT and UGA
 
#2,842
#2,842
LaagerVol said:
So basically they struggled against every defense with a pulse. They only scored 24 on us and we weren't very good on D.
Click to expand...

Before Bentley, they struggled against some teams that were not very good on defense. My point was that they improved once he became the starter.

Before Bentley, they only scored 10 against UK and 13 against A&M, both who did not have great defenses. They also scored 20 in a win against ECU, who gave up 35+ points eight times last season.

There was improvement late in the year even if it wasn't against good defenses.
 
#2,843
#2,843
VolGee4 said:
That probably should be broken down to pre-Bentley and post-Bentley. The offense played better after Bentley started. They only really struggled against UF and Clemson late in the year.
Click to expand...

They got shut down by those teams and let us be real, Mizzou and UT were terrible on D.
 
Last edited:
#2,846
#2,846
USC fans disagree with me, but I was not even close to impressed by Bentley.

He may be the next best thing, but I saw a kid doing just enough, not blowing things up

JMO

And I don't care if he was supposedly a high school senior due to reclassification. That's a tired narrative. His age was that of a true freshman
 
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top