delfonic
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
- Messages
- 3,214
- Likes
- 7,975
No, but it's a hell of lot quicker and more effective. They 100 percent would nuke Seoul first. You don't know ****.
Yeah, they don't have to nuke Seoul. If they lose one of a limited stock of ICBMs to essentially nuke a neighbor that they already have the ability to decimate instantly with artillery then they can't project force to US or the APAC. If they can't project force they are toast.
Sun-tzu, you ain't.